Vertical Collusion And Re-Running Tender: A Study Of The Decision Of The Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) NO: 17/KPPU-L/2022

Mardongan Parulian Panjaitan; Imam Haryanto; Iwan Erar Joesoef

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1010

Authors

Mardongan Parulian Panjaitan Study Program Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”, Jakarta
Imam Haryanto Study Program Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”, Jakarta
Iwan Erar Joesoef Study Program Magister Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1010

Keywords:

Vertical Conspiracy,, Retender,, Kppu Verdict.

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the Business Competition Supervisory Commission's consideration of re-tendering as a vertical conspiracy, as well as to examine arrangements for the application of re-tendering that provide legal certainty for project owners and tender participants. This research uses qualitative normative methods involving steps such as statutory studies, case studies, and conceptual approaches. This research uses a statutory approach to examine related regulations, a case approach to analyze decisions related to tender conspiracy, and a conceptual approach to understand relevant legal ideas and concepts. The results showed that the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) concluded that there was a tender conspiracy in the process of canceling and re-running the tender by PT Jakarta Propertindo (Perseroda). Where PT Jakarta Propertindo (Perseroda) is a company officially assigned by the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta to plan, build, manage, and maintain the Jakarta Arts Center Taman Ismail Marzuki. The Commission Panel found that the Reported Party I, which canceled the tender without a valid reason and could not be accounted for, deliberately did so to facilitate the Reported Party II and the Reported Party III to win the tender. Changes in the assessment procedures, especially in the experience aspect of the technical assessment, proved the intent of the Procurement Team to increase the technical scores of the Reported Party II and the Reported Party III. Thus, it confirms the role of KPPU in prohibiting vertical conspiracy and re-tendering in the practice of goods and services procurement, which provides legal certainty for project owners and tender participants

References

Adi Nugroho, Susanti. 2002. Pengantar Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Bogor: Puslitbang/Diklat Mahkamah Agung.

Agus Santoso, M. 2014. Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Kencana.

Ali, Zainudin. 2010. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Amirin, Tatang M. 1995. Menyusun Rencana Penelitian. Cetakan Ketiga, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arijanta, Setya Budi. 2022. Dalam Pendapatnya Terkait Penilaian Tender Selaku Ahli Pengadaan Barang dan/atau Jasa. Jakarta: LKPP.

Apeldoorn, L..J Van. 2003. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. Black’s Law Dictionary.

Campbell, Henry. 1990. Definition of the Terms and Pharases of American and English Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern. St. Paul Minnesota: West Publishing Co.

Davidson, Daniel. 1987. Comprehensive Business Law Principles and Case. St. Paul Minnesota: Kent Publishing Company.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. 2009. Teori Keadilan Jhon Rawls. Jakarta: Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume Nomor 1.

Friedman, W. 1990. Teori dan Filsafat Hukum, Telaah Kritis atasTeori-Teori Hukum (Susunan I). Jakarta: Rajawali.

Fuady, Munir Fuady. 1987. Comprehensive Business Law. Jakarta: Kent Publishing Company.

Garner, Bryan A. 1999. Black’s Law Dictionary. New York: Eight Edition, Editor in Chief West Publishing co.

Gunawan Widjaja, Ahmad Yani. 1999. Anti Monopoli. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo persada.

Handler, Milten. 1997. Trade Regulation Cases Materials – The Foundation Press Inc. New York: 4 th Edition.

Hanitijo Soemitro, Ronny. 1988. Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hansen, K. (2002). Undang-undang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat= Law concerning prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. (No Title).

Huijbers, Theo. 1995. Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Cetakan Delapan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

H Zainal Asikin, Amiruddin. 2006. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Indonesia, Peraturan Komisi Usaha Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing).

Indonesia, Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha tentang pedoman Pasal 22 Larangan Persekongkolan dalam Tender.

Joachim Friedrich, Carl. 2004. Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusa Media.

Kaplan, Bernard M. 1980. A Guide To Modern Business and Commercial Law Commerce. Boston: Clearing House.

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. 2022. Putusan Nomor 17/KPPU

Krisanto, Yakub Adi. 2005. Analisis Pasal 22 Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dan Karakteristik Putusan KPPU tentang Persekongkolan Tender. Jakarta: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis.

Kelsen, Hans. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Normatif. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. 2010. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

Marbun, Rocky. 2010. Dalam Persekongkolan Tender Barang dan Jasa. Jakarta: Pustaka Justisia.

Mardalis. 2004. Metode Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Pearcce, David W. 1983. Dictionary of Modern Economics. London: General Editor is Professor of Political Economy at University College.

Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive Advantage and Competitive Strategy. London: The Free Press.

Pound, Rescoe. 1978. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Prasetyo, Heru. 2006. Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Project, Elips. 2004. Persaingan Usaha dan Hukum yang Mengaturnya. Jakarta: Business Competition.

Rokan, M. K. (2012). Hukum persaingan usaha: teori dan praktiknya di Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Samuelsen, Paul E. 1998. Economic. Jakarta: Makalah Dawam Rahardjo KKN Kajian Konseptual dan Sosiokultural.

Sirait, Ningrum Natasya. 2003. Hukum Persaingan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Bangsa Pres.

Siswanto, Arie. 2002. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sitompul, Asril. 1999. Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (tinjauan terhadap Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Soekiman, Anton. 2022. Dalam Pendapatnya Terkait Tata Cara Pembatalan Tender. Jakarta: KPPU.

Tanya, Bernard L. 2010. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tarta Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Wiradiputra, Ditha. 2002. Fenomena Persekongkolan. Jakarta: Tabloid Mingguan KONTAN No. 26 Tahun VI.