Projection Of Climate Suitability For Mangosteen Based On Climate Change Scenarios In West Sumatra To Support National Resilience

Eka Alfred Sagala; Ernalem Bangun; Adi Subiyanto; Presly Panusunan Simanjuntak

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.1015

Authors

Eka Alfred Sagala Disaster Management Study Program, Faculty of National Security, Indonesian Defense University
Ernalem Bangun Disaster Management Study Program, Faculty of National Security, Indonesian Defense University
Adi Subiyanto Disaster Management Study Program, Faculty of National Security, Indonesian Defense University
Presly Panusunan Simanjuntak Bangka Belitung Climatology Station, Central Bangka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.1015

Keywords:

climate suitability, mangosteen plants, projections, RCP 4.5, national resilience

Abstract

The West Sumatra Provincial Government began to improve the development of the plantation sector of mangosteen, because the mangosteen plant became a superior commodity in the Province of West Sumatra. In this regard, it is important to know the climate suitability of the mangosteen plant and its projections, which will be used to take development planning steps in the appropriate area and support the increase in exports of mangosteen plants in West Sumatra Province to support national resilience in the face of climate change. The data used were monthly rainfall observation data and monthly air temperature for the period 2006-2015 at 46 rain posts in West Sumatra Province. The Minangkabau Meteorological Station is used as a reference station for monthly air temperatures estimation in 45 other rain posts which were calculated using the Braak method. Besides, land physical data such as soil texture and slope were used in each district in West Sumatra Province. Projected data used the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 scenario model for monthly air temperature and monthly rainfall from the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate (MIROC5) model with resolutions up to 20 x 20 km in the period 2006-2040. The projection data was divided into the baseline period for 2006-2015 and the projection period of 2031-2040. The climate suitability period was made for the present period 2006-2015 and the future projections for the period 2031- 2040. The results showed that the area of West Sumatra Province for the Very Appropriate category (S1) was decreasing in the projection period of 2031-2040 compared to the 2006-2015 baseline period. This can be seen in the projection period of the Very Appropriate category (S1), the area was reduced to 2,584,234 ha (72%) while in the baseline period the Very Corresponding category (S1) reached 2,811,321 ha (78%).

References

C. Braak, The Climate of The Netherlands Indies. Batavia :Javasche Boekhandel & Drukkerij, 1928.

C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance,” Clim Res, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24869236

D. Hapsari, R. Poerwanto, S. Didy, E. Santosa, and D. Matra, “Perubahan Morfofisiologi Bibit Manggis (Garcinia mangostana L.) terhadap Pemberian Polietilena Glikol (PEG,” Jurnal Hortikultura Indonesia, vol. 11, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.29244/jhi.11.1.1-12.

D. P. Sari, R. Novia, and Juniarti, “Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Tanaman Manggis dan Potensi Pengembangannya di Kecamatan Pauh Kota Padang,” Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 89–94, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.29244/jitl.22.2.89-94.

E. Makmur, Panduan Grads untuk Pemula. Jakarta: Pusat Klimatologi Dan Kualitas Udara BMKG, 2008.

F. C. Weiland, L. P. H. van Beek, J. C. J. Kwadijk, and M. F. P. Bierkens, “The ability of a GCM-forced hydrological model to reproduce global discharge variability,” Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1595–1621, 2010, doi: 10.5194/hess-14-1595-2010.

F. M. Barung, “Proyeksi Kesesuain Agroklimat Tanaman Padi Berdasarkan Skenario Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 dan RCP 8.5 di Propinsi Jawa TImur,” 2017.

H. Pawitan, J. S. Baharsjah, R. Boer, I. Amien, and B. D. Dasanto, “Keseimbangan Air Hidrologi Wilayah Indonesia Menurut Kabupaten,” Bogor, 1996.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. doi: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.

J. Juniarti, Y. Yulnafatmawita, and S. Isminingsih, “Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan dan Potensi Produksi Tanaman Manggis (Garcinia mangostana L.) di 50 Kab Kota,” Jurnal Solum, vol. 5, p. 14, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.25077/js.5.1.14-22.2008.

Kementerian Pertanian, “Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Hortikultura Manggis Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian 2020,” Jakarta, Aug. 2020.

R. E. Walpole, Pengantar Statistika, 3rd ed. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1995.

Subiyanto, Adi. Ketahanan Nasional Dan Resiliensi Iklim. Penerbit Qiara Media, 2022.

Z. Irfan, “Profil Usahatani Manggis Pada Tiga Daerah Sentra Produksi Di Sumatera Barat,” in Seminar Nasional Hortikultura, Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Sumatera Bara, 2005, pp. 86–104.