Urgency of Establishing Qanun on the Functional Duties of the High Prosecutor's Office in Aceh Province

Ridha Zikri; Thahir Luth; Aan Eko Widiarto

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1122

Authors

Ridha Zikri Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya
Thahir Luth Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya
Aan Eko Widiarto Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1122

Keywords:

Urgency; Qanun; Prosecutor's Office.

Abstract

The success and sustainability of the implementation of Islamic Shari'a in Aceh is not only the burden of local law enforcement agencies such as Wilayatul Hisbah, the Syar'iyah Court and the Islamic Shari'a Office, law enforcement agencies on a national scale are also involved such as the Indonesian National Police through the Aceh Regional Police and the Attorney General's Office in Aceh Province in charge of transferring Jinayat (Islamic criminal law) cases to the Syar'iyah Court. However, this task of the prosecutor's office is considered by the researcher to need improvement because the role of the prosecutor's office is responsible for the delegation of cases to 2 (two) different courts. Of course, this improvement is needed through Qanun which has legitimacy as a regional regulation in the Indonesian legal system. Based on this description, this research is a typology of normative (legal) research. The results and discussion in this study conclude: First, the area of Islamic shari'a law enforcement has a synchronization between Law Number 1 of 2021 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia with the Aceh Qanun in the enforcement of Islamic shari'a in Aceh. The presence of Islamic law enforcement agencies in Aceh does not mean that the task of enforcing Islamic law is only government agencies. Second, the Urgency of the establishment of Qanun Aceh Prosecutor's Functional Duty is a social condition that requires improvement in the enforcement of Islamic shari'a in Aceh

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer.

Ghonu, I. (2015). Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Justitia Et Pax, 31(2).

Ikhwan, M., & Daudy, M. H. (2019). Pelembagaan Hukum Jinayat di Aceh Sebagai Bagian Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Islam Universalia: International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences, 1(2): 180–212.

Kamil, S., Prihatna, A. A., Helmanita, K., Muslim, J. M., al-Makassary, R., Bakar, A. A., & Alawiyah, T. (2007). Syariah Islam dan HAM: dampak perda syariah terhadap kebebasan sipil, hak-hak perempuan dan non-muslim. Center for the Study of Religion and Culture (CSRC) UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Kuffal, H. M. A. (2003). Penerapan KUHAP dalam praktik hukum. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Mamudji, S., & Soekanto, S. (1995). Metode Penelitian Normatif. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

MaPPI-FHUI, T. (2015). Bunga Rampai Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Badan Penerbit FHUI.

Moelyo, D. (1997). Catatan Peristiwa Menarik: Mengulas Kasus-kasus Subversi, Korupsi, Kolusi, Ecstasy, dll. In Sumber Ilmu Jaya.

Mufrohim, O., & Herawati, R. (2020). Independensi Lembaga Kejaksaan sebagai Legal Structure didalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice System) di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3): 373–386.

Prakoso, D. (1985). Eksistensi Jaksa di tengah-tengah Masyarakat. Jakarta: Ghalia.

Prasetyo, R. E. (2015). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia.

Sahal, I. (2021). Menggugat Jaksa Sebagai Jabatan Fungsional. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(1): 37–49.

Supramono, G. (1991). Surat dakwaan dan putusan hakim yang batal demi hukum. Djambatan.

Denzin, Norman K. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2010). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage Publication.

Elvi, E. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Informan Pada Pembeliaan Terselubung Dalam Penyelidikan Tindak Pidana Narkotika: Studi Pada Ditresnarkoba Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Barat. Unes Journal Of Swara Justisia, 4(3): 237–245.