Empirical Approach in Border Defense in the North Natuna Sea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1215Abstract
This research explores an empiricist approach in the context of border defense in the North Natuna Sea, an area rich in strategic natural resources that requires intensive protection to maintain Indonesia's national and economic security. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach, with a focus on the analysis of literature studies that include scientific publications, government reports, and policy documents related to the use of field data in the context of defense. The results of this study show that an empirical approach is the main foundation in the formation of Indonesian policies related to the North Natuna Sea, supported by learning from previous conflict experiences such as the cases of Sipadan and Ligitan Islands. By leveraging strong field evidence, Indonesia ensures that every step taken is based on accurate and verified data. This approach not only enhances Indonesia's legal legitimacy in safeguarding its territorial sovereignty, but also provides a solid foundation for maintaining regional stability and national security in strategic areas such as North Natuna.
References
Adikara, A. P. B., & Munandar, A. I. (2021). TANTANGAN KEBIJAKAN DIPLOMASI PERTAHANAN MARITIM INDONESIA DALAM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK LAUT NATUNA UTARA. Jurnal Studi Diplomasi Dan Keamanan, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.31315/jsdk.v13i1.4365
Anthoni Sugianto, Dafri Agussalim, & Armaidy Armawi. (2021). Penanganan Keamanan Maritim Perbatasan Wilayah Laut dan Dampaknya pada Aspek Pertahanan Keamanan. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 9(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v9i2.395
Anugerah, B. (2021). PENGUATAN STRATEGI PENANGKALAN DALAM MERESPONS AKSI KOERSIF CINA DI LAUT NATUNA UTARA. Jurnal Dinamika Global, 6(02), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v6i2.701
Ardila, R., & Putra, A. K. (2021). Sengketa Wilayah Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (Studi Kasus Klaim Cina Atas Laut Natuna Utara). Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 1(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v1i3.10895
Arif, Putri, D. A. M., Fachrurrozi, M., & Seila Jessika. (2020). STRATEGI DIPLOMASI MILITER INDONESIA TERKAIT UPAYA PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK LAUT CHINA SELATAN TAHUN 2014-2019. . JURMAFIS: Journal of Social Science Tanjungpura University, 1–14.
Masykur, F. (2013). Metode Dalam Mencari Pengetahuan: Sebuah Pendekatan Rasionalisme Empirisme dan Metode Keilmuan. Tarbawi, 57–68.
Novianto, R. D., Firmansyah, D. A., & Pratama, N. A. (2020). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LAUT NATUNA UTARA. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 3(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v3i1.3074
Prabowo, E. E. (2013). KEBIJAKAN DAN STRATEGI PERTAHANAN INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Konfl ik Di Laut Cina Selatan). Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 118–129.
Puspitasari, R. (2016). KONTRIBUSI EMPIRISME TERHADAP PENDIDIKAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Ekonomi, 21–49.
Setiowati, R., Jati, S. P., Widodo, P., & Suharjo, B. (2021). Sinergitas Kementerian dan Lembaga dalam Mengantisipasi Konflik di Laut China Selatan. Rekayasa, 14(3), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v14i3.12577
Sitompul, M. A. (2022). Analisis Peran ASEAN Regional Forum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan. Publicio: Jurnal Ilmiah Politik, Kebijakan Dan Sosial, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51747/publicio.v4i1.695
Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.
Vera, S., & Hambali, R. Y. A. (2021). Aliran Rasionalisme dan Empirisme dalam Kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpiu.12207
Wahyuni, S. (2019). Strategi Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Klaim Traditional Fishing Ground Pada Zona Ekonomi Ekskusif Indonesia di Perairan Natuna Oleh Republik Rakyat Tiongkok. Jurnal Sosioreligius, 13–41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muh. Ikram Nur Ilahi, Achmed Sukendro, M. Adnan Madjid , Pujo Widodo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.