Formation of Indonesian Laws Post-2022 Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1235Keywords:
Indonesia, Law No. 13 of 2022, Legal Politics, Legislation formation, Omnibus MethodAbstract
This study aims to analyze the evolution of legal politics in Indonesia’s legislative framework following the amendment of Law No. 12/2011 through the enactment of Law No. 13/2022. This amendment introduced the omnibus method as an innovative approach to drafting regulations. Employing a qualitative methodology rooted in doctrinal legal research and normative analysis, the study examines legal texts, judicial decisions, and other legislative materials. The methodology emphasizes the analysis of legal principles and norms to ensure alignment with constitutional directives and international legal standards. The findings indicate that the implementation of the omnibus method enhances efficiency in the legislative process by consolidating overlapping regulations into a cohesive legal framework. This approach facilitates efforts to address regulatory overload and promotes greater legal certainty. Nevertheless, the study identifies challenges such as resistance within the legislative process and the necessity for continuous oversight to maximize the benefits of this approach. In conclusion, the enactment of Law No. 13/2022 represents a pivotal advancement toward a more responsive and efficient legislative framework in Indonesia. This research provides a valuable contribution to understanding the political dynamics of legal reform and the broader implications of adopting the omnibus method in the national legislative system.
References
Christiawan, R. (2021). Omnibus Law Theory and Application. Sinar Grafika.
Fuller, L. (1964). The Morality of Law (New Heaven). Yale University.
Hantoro, N. M. (2020). The Concept of Omnibus Law and the Challenges of Its Implementation in Indonesia. Jurnal Parliamentary Review, 2(1).
Listio, R. (2023). Omnibus Law as an Answer to Employment Law Problems in Indonesia. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(2), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i2.31
Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, (2020).
Manan, B. (2011). In Jazim Hamidi & Kemilau Mutik (Legal Draf). Total media.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2003). Responsive Law, an Option in Transition (Penerjemah Rafael Edy Bosco (ed.)). Ford Foundation-HuMa.
Peters., A., & Kosrini, S. (1990). Law and Social Development, Textbook of the Sociology of Law (Buku III). Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Putra, M. D., Negara, T. A. S., Widiarto, A. E., & Qurbani, I. D. (2023). Legislative Formation Design Using the Right Omnibus Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(7), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i7.1295
Ridwan, H. . (2003). State Administrative Law. UII Press.
Ruhijat, T. R. (2019). Bunga Rampai : Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. In Imran (Ed.), Bunga Rampai Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Rushagama, F. M., & Dsm, L. L. M. (2024). Combined Doctrinal and Qualitative Approach in Legal Researches : An over view. 9(1), 1780–1785.
Sidharta, B. A., & Meuwissen. (2007). On the Development of Legal Science, Legal Theory and Legal Philosophy. Refika Aditama.
Sulaiman. (2014). Responsive Law: Law as a Social Institution Serving Social Needs in Transition: Law as a Social Institution Serving Social Needs in Transition). Samudra Justice Journal Of Law, 9(2), 12.
Tamrin, A. (2015). Constitutional Change and Indonesian Constitutional Reform. Journal of Legal Mind, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v2i1.1843
Umbara, D. (2020). Pancasila As Philosopische Grondslag And The Position Of Pancasila In Relation With Theorie Von Stafenufbau Der Rechtsordnung.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Min Usihen, Tunggul Anshari, R. Benny Riyanto, Aan Eko Widiarto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.