Overviewing the Context of Balance of Power to the South China Sea Issue in ASEAN

Authors

  • Welly Puji Ginanjar Defense Diplomacy, Faculty of Defense Strategy, the Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Budi Pramono Defense Diplomacy, Faculty of Defense Strategy, the Republic of Indonesia Defense University,
  • Priyanto Defense Diplomacy, Faculty of Defense Strategy, the Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i4.372

Keywords:

South China Sea, balance of Power, ASEAN

Abstract

The issue to raise is that the South China Sea has potential resources not only natural resource but also the geostrategy and geopolitics concerns. Geographically, the sea is a waterway for any activities for Asia Pacific countries and part of it is in the region of South East Asia. The tension emerges when China unilaterally claims that the all area of SCS is part of China based on the nine-dash line of historical Chinese fishing ground drawing. The claim definitely prompts protest and condemnation from other countries which claim have the authority in the water as well. As a result, the countries in South East Asia like Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines launch their objections against China. This situation ignites another ‘world’s great power’ to intervene. The United States proclaims to form Quadrilateral Security Dialogue consisting U.S., India, Australia and Japan as the members. Indeed, the dialogue’s intention is to confront China’s activity in the waters. Therefore, the inquiry to look at is how should ASEAN play its role to create balance and stability in the waters, or extensively in the South East Asia region? To answer this question, it will observe the issue using the realism paradigm since the issue concerns the state's foreign politics and the effort to create order and stability. Through the realism paradigm, the balance of power will be the concept to address the issue. Thus, it is ASEAN’s effort of the balance of power within the conflict and domination of unilateral interests.

References

Acharya, A. (2017). The myth of ASEAN centrality? . Contemporary Southeast Asia. 39. 273-279, 273-279.

Anwar, A. (2018). Ratification of SEANWFZ: Origin of the Common Idea and Its Consistency. Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan, Vol 10, No 2 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.31315/jsdk.v10i2.2564, 13-28.

AS, B. (2018). The Study of Foreign Policy in International Relations. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, J Pol Sci Pub Aff 2018, 6:4 DOI: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000337, 1-9.

ASEAN. (2012, May 11). Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone. Retrieved from https://asean.org/: https://asean.org/treaty-on-the-southeast-asia-nuclear-weapon-free-zone/

ASEAN. (2019, June 23). ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific . Retrieved from https://asean.org/speechandstatement/asean-outlook-on-the-indo-pacific/

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 5th. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.

Djalal, H. (2000). South China Sea Island Disputes. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 2000 Supplement No. 8:9-21, 9-21.

Dutton, P. (2011). Three Disputes and Three Objectives—China and the South China Sea. Naval War College Review Volume 64 Number 4 Autumn Article 6, 42-67.

Emmers, R. (2018). Unpacking ASEAN Neutrality: The Quest for Autonomy and Impartiality in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), doi: 10.1355/cs40-3a, 349-79.

Evn. (2020, November 27). Jepang Kecam Klaim Menlu China Atas Pulau Sengketa. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20201127184957-113-575492/jepang-kecam-klaim-menlu-china-atas-pulau-sengketa

Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guoxing, J. (1998). China Versus South China Sea Security. Security Dialogue Vol. 29, No. 1 (MARCH 1998), 101-112.

Hanada, R. (2019). The Role of US-Japan-Australia-India Cooperation, or the ‘Quad,’in FOIP: A Policy Coordination Mechanism for a Rules-Based Order. CSIS Strategic Japan Working Paper, 1-17.

Hazmi, A. (2020, January 21). What is “ASEAN Way”? Retrieved from https://seasia.co/: https://seasia.co/2020/01/21/what-is-asean-way

Heiduk, F. (2016). Indonesia in ASEAN Regional Leadership between Ambition and Ambiguity. SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 1-38.

Herdiansyah, H. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Perspetif Konvensional dan Kontempore Edisi Ke-2. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Ikbar, Y. (2014). Metodologi dan Teori Hubungan Internasional. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Kompas. (2021, March 15). Quad, Pembendung Kebangkitan China. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/: https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2021/03/15/quad-pembendung-kebangkitan-china

Laksmana, E. A. (2020). Whose Centrality? ASEAN and the Quad in the Indo-Pacific. The Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, Special Issue, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2020, 106-117.

Levi, J. S. (2004). Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in 21th Century in T.V. Paul, and James Wirtz, and Michel Fortmann. Standford: Standford University Press.

Maulana, V. (2015, November 12). Inilah Posisi Resmi Indonesia soal Konflik Laut China Selatan. Retrieved from https://international.sindonews.com: https://international.sindonews.com/berita/1060987/40/inilah-posisi-resmi-indonesia-soal-konflik-laut-china-selatan

Midford, P. (2015). Japan’s Approach to Maritime Security in the South China Sea. Asian Survey (2015) 55 (3): 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.3.525 , 525-547.

Perwita, A. B. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Jakarta: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pitsuwan, D. S. (2009). “Building an ASEAN Economic Community in the heart of East Asia” . Retrieved from https://www.ide.go.jp/library/Japanese/Event/Sympo/pdf/2009/surin_en.pdf

Putri, V. K. (2021, July 13). Alasan dan Tujuan Deklarasi Zopfan di ASEAN. Retrieved from www.kompas.com: https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2021/07/13/152804169/alasan-dan-tujuan-deklarasi-zopfan-di-asean

Rahayu, L. S. (2020, January 3). 4 Poin Sikap Indonesia soal Klaim China di Laut Natuna. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4845324/4-poin-sikap-indonesia-soal-klaim-china-di-laut-natuna/2

Reuters. (2015, April 15). Philippines seeks help from U.S. in South China Sea dispute. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-philippines-usa-idUSKBN0N616A20150415

Santoro, D. (2019). Beijing’s South China Sea Aggression Is a Warning to Taiwan. Foreign Policy, 16., 1-3.

Southgate, L. (2021). ASEAN: still the zone of peace, freedom and neutrality? POLITICAL SCIENCE 2021, VOL. 73, NO. 1, 31–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2021.1967762, 31-47.

Sulaiman, Y. (2020, January 14). Mengapa Indonesia terus bersikap tidak tegas dalam sengketa Laut Natuna dengan Cina. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com: https://theconversation.com/mengapa-indonesia-terus-bersikap-tidak-tegas-dalam-sengketa-laut-natuna-dengan-cina-129893

Vu, T.-M. (2016). International Leadership as a Process: The case of China in Southeast Asia. Rev. Bras. Polít. Int., 60(1): e001, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600109, 1-21.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Welly Puji Ginanjar, Budi Pramono, & Priyanto. (2023). Overviewing the Context of Balance of Power to the South China Sea Issue in ASEAN. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i4.372

Issue

Section

Social Science