Transition Of Authority Judicial Institutions Simultaneous National Elections 2024

Salahudin Pakaya; Roy Moonti; Yusrianto Kadir; Taufik  Firmanto

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.496

Authors

Salahudin Pakaya Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
Roy Moonti Universitas Gorontalo
Yusrianto Kadir Universitas Gorontalo
Taufik Firmanto University of Muhammadiyah Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.496

Keywords:

2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections, Specialized Judicial Body, Constitutional Court

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013 resulted in changes in the function and authority of the judicial institution that adjudicates Pilkada. The Constitutional Court's decision then gave birth to Article 157 of Law No. 10 of 2016 Amending Law No. 8 of 2015 (Pilkada Law) which contains provisions for the establishment of a special election judicial body that will hear disputes over the results of simultaneous national elections in 2024. However, the establishment of a special election judicial body mandated by the Pilkada Law still faces juridical obstacles if it is linked to Law 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, and laws governing judicial bodies under the auspices of the Supreme Court, especially the general and state administrative courts. Another juridical problem is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 which states that the phrase "until a special judicial body is established" in Article 157 paragraph (3) of the Pilkada Law does not have binding legal force. So that the Constitutional Court's decision can be interpreted as a sign of defining the Constitutional Court as a permanent judicial institution to hear disputes over Pilkada results. This research uses normative research methods as a characteristic of legal research, using statute law approaches, expert opinions. The purpose of this research is to search and find the right norms and have legal arguments in determining the right judicial institution authorized to hear disputes over the results of the 2024 simultaneous regional elections.

References

Suyatno, S. Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia. Polit. Indones. Indones. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1, 212 (2016).

Reza, I. F. Redefinisi Publicness Dalam Ruang Lingkup Administrasi Publik Di Indonesia. Natapraja 4, (2016).

Simamora, J. Eksistensi Pemilukada Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Daerah Yang Demokratis. Mimbar Huk. 23, (2011).

Pakaya, S. Political Law Regulation of Judicial Institutions in Exercising the Powers of an Independent Judgment: Before and After Amendments to the 1945 Constitution. Int. J. Pap. Public Rev. 1, (2020).

Firmanto, T., Fadli, M., Safaat, M. A. & Istislam. Ratio Legis Regulation of the Establishment of a Judicial Agency Specific Election of Regional Head in Indonesia. Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Economic Sci. 111, 121–131 (2021).

RI, M. K. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Nomor 85/PUU-XX/2022. (2022).

Usman, F. & Pakaya, Salahudin, Hadi, I. Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Hasilpemilihan Kepala Daerah. Tanwir Law Rev. 41–51 (2022).

M. Mahrus Ali, dkk. Tafsir Konstitusional Pelanggaran Pemilukada yang Bersifat Sistematis, Terstruktur dan Masif (The Constitutional Interpretation on The Systematic, Structured and Massive Violation of The Local Head General Election). (2011).

Safwandy, A. M., Jalil, H. & Rasyid, M. N. Pergeseran Rezim Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia. Kanun J. Ilmu Huk. 21, 361–376 (2020).

Supriyadi, S. & Kasim, A. Desain Badan Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. J. Konstitusi 17, (2020).

Jimly Asshiddiqie. Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. (Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2009).

Zainal Arifin Hosein. KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA; Sejarah Kedudukan , Fungsi, dan Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. (Setara Press, 2016).

La Ode Husen. NEGARA HUKUM, DEMOKRASI, DAN PEMISAHAN KEKUASAAN. (Social Politic Genius, 2019).

Muhammad Aqil Irham. DEMOKRASI MUKA DUA; Membaca Ulang Pilkada di Indonesia. (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2016).

Muhammad Najib. JALAN DEMOKRASI; Pengalaman Indonesia, Turki, dan Mesir. (Republik Penerbit, 2019).

RI, M. K. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Nomor 072- 073 /PUU-II/2004. (2004).

Kelliher, C. et al. Unconstitutional authority of Indonesia’s constitutional court: The resolution of pilkada result disputes. Elect. Law J. Rules, Polit. Policy 18, 297–308 (2019).