Implementation Of The Kurikulum Merdeka At The Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.634Keywords:
kurikulum merdeka, Teacher Readiness, Learning ToolsAbstract
The teachers who will carry out an kurikulum merdeka in their respective schools certainly prepare the learning process starting from the design of learning tools, implementation to learning evaluation. In the design process, teachers are still hesitant because they have to make considerable changes outside the norm and must adjust to the characteristics of the school and students, besides that there are quite crucial obstacles such as the ability of teachers to master IT where the kurikulum merdeka is full of IT, and there are also obstacles related to the understanding of the kurikulum merdeka, it is found that teachers do not really understand the independent curriculum itself, more precisely in the development of an kurikulum merdeka such as teachers are only equipped with learning outcomes and for the elaboration of the Learning Objectives Flow (ATP), Teaching Module (MA), Pancasila Student Profile, Learning Objectives Achievement Criteria (KKTP), Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL), Operational Curriculum in the Education Unit (KOSP) teachers are required to be able to develop until learning is carried out. The purpose of this study is to identify and obtain information about teacher readiness in designing learning tools. The method used in this study is a descriptive method, namely by describing the subject about the situation and the data obtained during the observation and interview so that it becomes information to overcome the problems found. The results of this study show that teachers experience obstacles in preparing for the implementation of an kurikulum merdeka. Teachers have tried to prepare learning both intracurricular learning and projects to strengthen the profile of pancasila students. However, teachers feel that the results of the learning design they have developed are not yet mature to be implemented in the classroom.
References
Abd. Syakur, Sugirin, & Widiarni. (2020). The Effectiveness of English Learning Media through Google Classroom in Higher Education. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 2(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.218
Alhamuddin, Fanani, A., Yasin, I., & Murniati, A. (2020). Politics of Education in Curriculum Development Policy in Indonesia from 1947 to 2013: A Documentary Research. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.91.29-56
Alyaarubi, H. J., Alkindi, D. S., & Ahmed, E. R. (2021). Internal Auditing Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 4(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.4.2.2021.6054
Clark, S. K., Lott, K., Larese-Casanova, M., Taggart, A. M., & Judd, E. (2021). Leveraging Integrated Science and Disciplinary Literacy Instruction to Teach First Graders to Write Like Scientists and to Explore Their Perceptions of Scientists. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 1153–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09927-9
Daga, A. T., Wahyudin, D., & Susilana, R. (2022). Implementation of Teacher’s Pedagogic Competence In The 2013 Curriculum Learning Process in Elementary School. Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies, 2(5), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.36418/edv.v2i5.439
Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627
Drew, S. V., & Thomas, J. (2018). Secondary science teachers’ implementation of CCSS and NGSS literacy practices: A survey study. Reading and Writing, 31, 267–291.
Hand, B., Shelley, M. C., Laugerman, M., Fostvedt, L., & Therrien, W. (2018). Improving critical thinking growth for disadvantaged groups within elementary school science: A randomized controlled trial using the Science Writing Heuristic approach. Science Education, 102(4), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21341
Haqiyah, A. (2021). Flipped classroom model integrated with the online learning platform and video biomechanic analysis to enhance learning outcome of Pencak silat during the Covid-19 pandemic. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(11), 2267–2272.
Jamaludin, U., Awiria, A., Sudrajat, A., & Prawira, A. Y. (2021). Analysis of Character Education Values in 4th Grade Student Thematic Books in the 2013 Curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1167–1174. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.561
Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Preferences for Online and Blended Learning: Motivational vs. Cognitive. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 71–85. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/
Kurniaman, O., & Zufriady, Z. (2019). The Effectiveness of Teaching Materials for Graphic Organizers in Reading in Elementary School Students. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 3(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.3.1.p.48-62
Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers & Education, 118, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003
Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00035. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200035
Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737–750.
Maskur, R., Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Kinarya Palupi, E. (2020). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. Retrieved from http://www.eu-jer.com
Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A Case Study of Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions in a Finnish High School during the COVID Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369. Retrieved from http://www.ijtes.net
Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Masek, A., Sudira, P., & Samsudin, A. (2021). Crucial Problems in Arranged the Lesson Plan of Vocational Teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 345–354.
Oktaweri, S., Festiyed, & Djamas, D. (2019). Curriculum analysis in developing interactive multimedia teaching materials scientific model assisted games for physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012118
Rostini, D., Zaeni Achmad Syam, R., & Achmad, W. (2022). The Significance of Principal Management on Teacher Performance and Quality of Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2513–2520. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1721
Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710
Sari, E. (2019). The Effect of Motivation and Discipline on Employee Performance at the Ministry of Transportation’s Directorate of Ports. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v1i1.33
Scales, R. Q., Wolsey, T. D., Lenski, S., Smetana, L., Yoder, K. K., Dobler, E., … Young, J. R. (2018). Are We Preparing or Training Teachers? Developing Professional Judgment in and Beyond Teacher Preparation Programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702584
Sinaga, R. R. F., & Pustika, R. (2021). Exploring Students’ Attitude Towards English Online Learning Using Moodle During Covid-19 Pandemic At Smk Yadika Bandarlampung. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i1.850
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung. In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 65–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
Udayani, N. K. R. T. K., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Rati, N. W. (2021). Development Of E-Comic Learning Media On The Topic Of The Human Digestive System. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 472–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.34732
Yamaç, A., Öztürk, E., & Mutlu, N. (2020). Effect of digital writing instruction with tablets on primary school students’ writing performance and writing knowledge. Computers & Education, 157, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103981
Yusnita, Y., Eriyanti, F., Engkizar, E., Anwar, F., Putri, N. E., Arifin, Z., & Syafril, S. (2018). The Effect of Professional Education and Training for Teachers (PLPG) in Improving Pedagogic Competence and Teacher Performance. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.2701
Zhu, X., Law, K. S., Sun, C., & Yang, D. (2019). Thriving of employees with disabilities: The roles of job self‐efficacy, inclusion, and team‐learning climate. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21920
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nadrah Nadrah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.