Quality Governance Design Good University Governance In The Education Sector: a Literature Review of Concepts Performance Models and Audit Practices From a Risk Management Perspective

Authors

  • M Rusdi FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Delita Sartika FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Iwan Putra FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Nurmala Sari FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.682

Keywords:

Good University Governance, Quality, Governance, Performance, Audit

Abstract

This research outlines the research methodology used in a literature review on the Quality Governance Design of Good University Governance (GUG) in the education sector, with a focus on the GUG concept, performance models, and audit practices from a risk management perspective. The GUG concept is a vital framework for enhancing the quality and effectiveness of higher education institutions such as universities, with principles of transparency, accountability, participation, and ethics as its core components. This concept also emphasizes the importance of innovative ideas and the leadership capabilities of university leaders in facing global changes. Furthermore, this research discusses relevant performance models, including the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), which assist universities in measuring their performance through financial, customer, internal process, and growth and learning perspectives. These models help universities become more focused, transparent, and accountable in their governance. Audit practices, both internal and external, are also essential elements in higher education risk management. Internal audits help identify operational, financial, and reputational risks, while external audits ensure compliance with accreditation standards. Audit practices help universities manage risks efficiently and strengthen transparency and accountability in educational governance. This research also illustrates the integration of the GUG concept in higher education, including internal and external quality assurance, program accreditation, and sustainable quality improvement. Previous research indicates that many factors influence the quality of university governance, including government influence, leadership, and quality assurance priorities.

Author Biographies

Delita Sartika, FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

Iwan Putra, FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

Nurmala Sari, FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

FKIP Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

References

Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118458

Ajili, H., & Bouri, A. (2018). Corporate governance quality of Islamic banks: measurement and effect on financial performance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2017-0131

Arda, O. A., Bayraktar, E., & Tatoglu, E. (2019). How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2190

Arniati, T., Puspita, D. A., Amin, A., & Pirzada, K. (2019). The implementation of good corporate governance model and auditor independence in earnings’ quality improvement. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 188.

Beerkens, M. (2020). Evidence-based policy and higher education quality assurance: progress, pitfalls and promise. In Impact Evaluation of Quality Management in Higher Education (pp. 38–53). Routledge.

Cole, R., Stevenson, M., & Aitken, J. (2019). Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309

Cordery, C. J., & Hay, D. (2019). Supreme audit institutions and public value: Demonstrating relevance. Financial Accountability & Management, 35(2), 128–142.

Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C. (2021). The UK higher education senior management survey: a statactivist response to managerialist governance. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2134–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693

Geisler, M., Berthelsen, H., & Muhonen, T. (2019). Retaining Social Workers: The Role of Quality of Work and Psychosocial Safety Climate for Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2019.1569574

Gustavson, M., & Sundström, A. (2018). Organizing the Audit Society: Does Good Auditing Generate Less Public Sector Corruption? Administration & Society, 50(10), 1508–1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716674306

Heydari, M., & Mohammadzadeh Salteh, H. (2020). The effect of performance audit economy, efficiency and effectiveness criteria on the accountability level of Ardebil province executive agencies’ managers referred to in Article (5) of the Civil Service Management. Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 6(04), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol6iss04pp13-18

Ho, A. T. (2018). From Performance Budgeting to Performance Budget Management: Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12915

Hünefeld, L., Gerstenberg, S., & Hüffmeier, J. (2020). Job satisfaction and mental health of temporary agency workers in Europe: a systematic review and research agenda. Work & Stress, 34(1), 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1567619

Jamal Ali, B., & Anwar, G. (2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.2.3

Jarernsiripornkul, S., & Pandey, I. M. (2018). Governance of autonomous universities: case of Thailand. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-12-2016-0103

Kooli, C. (2019). Governing and managing higher education institutions: The quality audit contributions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 77, 101713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101713

Lonsdale, J., & Mayne, J. (2018). “Neat and Tidy… and 100% Correct”: Assuring the Quality of Supreme Audit Institution Performance Audit 1 Work. In Quality Matters (pp. 173–196). Routledge.

McCaffery, P. (2018). The higher education manager’s handbook: effective leadership and management in universities and colleges. Routledge.

Muralidharan, K., & Singh, A. (2020). Improving Public Sector Management at Scale? Experimental Evidence on School Governance India. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28129

Ozturk, I. (2020). Coercive isomorphism in higher education: Direct pressures from the state to the Turkish universities. 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20), 30-05–2020, 911–918.

Parker, L. D., Jacobs, K., & Schmitz, J. (2018). New public management and the rise of public sector performance audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2964

Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., & Johnsen, Å. (2018). Performance Audits and Supreme Audit Institutions’ Impact on Public Administration: The Case of the Office of the Auditor General in Norway. Administration & Society, 50(10), 1422–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715623315

Rozi, F., Bali, M., Firdaus, S., Wijaya, M., Mursyidi, R. A. Al, Haqiki, M. W., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Learning management; identifying learning styles of language learners in madrasah. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 5, 3783–3790.

Sari, D. A., Margules, C., Lim, H. S., Sayer, J. A., Boedhihartono, A. K., Macgregor, C. J., Dale, A. P., & Poon, E. (2022). Performance Auditing to Assess the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(19), 12772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912772

Sartawi, A. M. A. M. Al, & Sanad, Z. (2019). Institutional ownership and corporate governance: evidence from Bahrain. Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1504/AAJFA.2019.096916

Sharifi, A., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of The Total Environment, 749, 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391

Steiss, A. W. (2019). Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. Routledge.

Sudiardhita, K. I. R., Mukhtar, S., Hartono, B., Sariwulan, T., & Nikensari, S. I. (2018). The effect of compensation, motivation of employee and work satisfaction to employee performance Pt. Bank Xyz (Persero) Tbk. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 1–14.

Wahyudi, W. (2018). THE INFLUENCE OF JOB SATISFACTION AND WORK EXPERIENCE ON LECTURER PERFORMANCE OF PAMULANG UNIVERSITY. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REFLECTION : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 1(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v1i2.140

Waris, M., & Haji Din, B. (2023). Impact of corporate governance and ownership concentrations on timelines of financial reporting in Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2164995. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2164995

Williamson, B. (2019). Policy networks, performance metrics and platform markets: Charting the expanding data infrastructure of higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2794–2809. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12849

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Rusdi, M., Sartika, D. ., Putra, I. ., & Sari, N. . . (2023). Quality Governance Design Good University Governance In The Education Sector: a Literature Review of Concepts Performance Models and Audit Practices From a Risk Management Perspective. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.682

Issue

Section

Social Science