Money Laundering And Corruption Offences After The Constitutional Court Decision Number 77/PUU-XII/2014

A Ira Fadilla Rohmadanti; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati Yuliati

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.933

Authors

A Ira Fadilla Rohmadanti Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
Prija Djatmika Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
Yuliati Yuliati Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.933

Abstract

The application to the Constitutional Court with the Constitutional Court decision number 77/PUU-XII/2014 was based on the dissinting opinion of Hakum Alecander Mawarta in the TPPU case of the Central Jakarta District Court with Case Number 10.Pid.Sus-TPK/2014/PN.JKT.PST. Based on this judicial review, the Constitutional Court stated that the existence of Article 69 in Law No. 8/2010, which states that law enforcement officials are allowed to investigate, investigate and examine ML/TF cases without proving the original crime, is questionable because it is not in accordance with the characteristics of ML/TF as a continuation of the original crime. Thus, there are juridical implications that will occur related to the prevention of ML, among others: potential acquittal of the defendant; violation of the principle of presumption of innocence, contrary to the concept of proof adopted in Indonesia and so forth. Of course, in this research, the author will reconstruct the placement of the Money Laundering Crime as Independent Crimes along with its legal implications in practice. This is because the placement of the Money Laundering Crime as Independent Crimes has given legal consequences to the legal system adopted in Indonesia, one of which is the Presumption of Innocence. This research is a descriptive analytical literature research using juridical-normative approach and qualitative deductive method. In doing so, it is concluded that the development of ML has experienced increasingly complex developments and legal breakthroughs that place ML as a stand-alone criminal offence.

References

Ali, A. (2004). Straightening the Path of Law Reform. Agatama Press.

Andi, H. (2012). Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia and its Development. Medan Sofmedia.

Anshorudin. (2004). The Law of Evidence According to Islamic Procedural Law and Positive Law. Student Library.

Atmasasmita, R. (2009). The Legal Logic of the Presumption of Innocence: A Reaction to the Individualistic Paradigm. Online Law.

Denniagi, E. (2021). Analysis of the Economics of Punishment for the Crime of Money Laundering in Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering. Journal of Lex Renaissance, 6(2), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss2.art3

Eleanora, F. N. (2011). The Crime of Money Laundering by : Fransiska Novita Eleanora FH MPU Tantular University Jakarta. Journal of Law, XXVI(2), 640-653.

Emirzon, J. (2017). Forms of Practice and Modes of Money Laundering Crime. National Seminar Paper on Business/Economic Law, 1-26.

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021a). Analysis of the Implementation of the Non-Conviction-Based Concept in the Practice of Asset Recovery of Money Laundering Criminal Act in Indonesia from the Perspective of Presumption of Innocence. Journal of Jurisprudence, 11(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i1.13961

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021b). Legal Development Through the Implementation of Non-Conviction Based Concepts in Money Laundering Asset Recovery Practices in Indonesia. 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR 2021), 506-513. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211112.066

Garnasih, Y. (2015). Enforcement of Anti-Money Laundering Law and its Problems in Indonesia. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Ginting, Y. P., & Indradewi, A. A. (2021). Suspicious Financial Transactions from Electronic Money during the Covid 19 Pandemic. Semarang State University National Seminar on Law, 7(2), 455-476.

Greenberg, T. S. (2009). Stolen Asset Recovery: A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (StAR Initiative). World Bank Publications.

Halif. (2017). Proving the Crime of Money Laundering without Criminal Origin. Judicial Journal, 10(2), 173-192.

Hamdani, F. (2021). The Urgency of Implementing the Non-Conviction Bassed Concept in the Practice of ML Asset Recovery in Indonesia. In I. Rishan, A. E. Martha, & D. Setiawan (Eds.), Law as a Driver of Sustainable Development in Indonesia. FH UII Press.

Hamzah, A. (2008). Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Sinar Grafika.

Hansen, L. S. (2012). Know Your Customer Principles as an Effort to Prevent and Eradicate Money Laundering Practices through Fund Transfers. In Thesis. Postgraduate Programme, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia.

Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Discussion of Problems and Application of the Criminal Procedure Code: Trial Examination, Appeal, Cassation and Judicial Review. Sinar Grafika.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Theory & Law of Evidence. Erlangga.

Junaidi, M. (2018). Separation of Money Laundering Investigation from Corruption as Predicate Crime. In Thesis. Postgraduate Programme, Faculty of Law, University of North Sumatra.

Kurniawan, I. (2013). The Development of the Crime of Money Laundering and its Impact on the Economic and Business Sectors. Journal of Legal Science, 3(1), 1-14.

Supreme Court. (2006). Academic Paper: Money Laundering. SUPREME COURT OF INDONESIA.

Moeljatno. (1993). Principles of Criminal Law. Rieneke Cipta.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2018). Criminal Theories and Policies (Ed. Revised). Alumni.

Nugroho, N., Siregar, M., & Munthe, R. (2020). Legal Analysis of the Prevention of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering by Bank Negara Indonesia. Arbiter, 2(1), 100-110. http://jurnalmahasiswa.uma.ac.id/index.php/arbiter

Nurcahyati, F. (2021). Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 77/PUU-XII/2014 Regarding Proof of Original Crime in Concursus of Money Laundering Crime. Journal of Supermasi Hukum, 10(2), 185-210.

Implementation of JDIH BPK Representative of Central Java Province. (2019). Evidence of Criminal Origin related to the Crime of Money Laundering (TPPU) in Corruption Cases in Indonesia.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Legal Research revised edition. Prenada Media Group.

Poernomo, B. (2000). Orientation of Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Law in the Realm of Order. UKI Press.

Rahmi, A., & Lubis, S. P. (2017). Criminal Responsibility for Children Who Commit Physical Violence Against Domestic Helpers (Analysis of Decision Number: 27/Pid.Sus Anak/2014/PN.MDN). Journal of De Lega Lata, 2(2), 262-284.

Rampadio, H., Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The urgency of arrangement regarding illicit enrichment in Indonesia in order to eradicate corruption crimes by corporations. Journal of Law Reform, 9(2), 225-241.

Saleh, R. (1983). Criminal Acts and Criminal Liability. Angkasa Baru.

Satria, H. (2012). Ordering SKPP by the Prosecutor's Office in the Criminal Justice Process. Genta Publishing.

Yanuar, A. (2019). Discourse between the Position of Money Laundering Offences. Constitutional Journal, 16(4), 721-739.

Yanuar, M. A. (2021). The Crime of Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture. Setara Press.