Gross Human Rights Violations Of Slavery And Human Abuse In Cages In Lagkat District (Analysis of Stabat District Court Decision Number 467/Pid.B/2022/PN Stb)

Authors

  • Riki Hamdany Master of Laws, Postgraduate Program at Panca Budi Development University, Medan
  • Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Master of Laws, Postgraduate Program at Panca Budi Development University, Medan
  • Rahmayanti Rahmayanti Master of Laws, Postgraduate Program at Panca Budi Development University, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.999

Keywords:

Yuridis review, ruling out, Indonesian police officer, Islamic Defense Front (FPI)

Abstract

The state must respect, cherish, and protect human rights as a legal instrument. Humanity itself possesses the right to live, not to be tortured, and never to be enslaved. With the provisions on human rights and the punishment of human trafficking, everyone enjoys legal protection from acts of degrading human dignity. As described in the provisions of the Law on the Prohibition of Slavery in Indonesia, this is regulated in some of the laws applicable nationally in the country of Indonesia. This prohibition on slavery, or slavery, can be found in Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights in the section that explains a few of the human prohibitions on non-slavery, namely Article (4), Article (20), and in Article (2) of the Act No. 21 of 2007 on the Trafficking in Persons. The case of a human skull in Langkat, North Sumatra, is a terrible crime against humanity. The victims clearly experienced practices of violence, torture, deprivation of rights, and similar acts of human slavery. Reports and facts on the ground show evidence that leads to systematic and structured crime, committed deliberately by the government apparatus. The perpetrators have violated the provisions of Act No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights and also those contained in Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Suppression of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons; explicitly, this act is in accordance with the meaning of human trafficking. There's a lot of people around, even officials who know where they are and what's going on inside the cage. But they 'proclaim' the condition. No one has attempted to counter the occurrences in the Rare Non-Active House for years. The surrounding society becomes a majority silent, or'majority quiet' over the phenomenon. Neither of the victims, they nor their families, have any basic knowledge of their rights, so that only "sacracy" can be done. They assume they made a mistake and deserve punishment. The company's owners physically hardened them for years, solely for their economic benefit.

References

Anshari Tampil Siregar, 2011, Metodologi Penelitia Hukum, , Pustaka bangsa Press, Medan.

Aswanto dan Wilma Silalahi, 2021, Perlindungan, Penghormatan dan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Domestik dan Internasional, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok

Ahmad Sayuti Anshari”Perbudakan Dalam Hukum Islam” Dalam Jurnal, Volume XV Nomor 1, Januari 2015, hal 12.

Achjani R Eva Zulfa-Indriyanto Senomor Adji, 2018, Pergeseran Paradikma Pemidanaan, Lubuk Agung, Bandung

Belardo Mega Jaya, Muhammad Rusli Arafat, ‘Universalism Vs. Cultural Relativism dan Implementasinya dalam Hak Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia’ 17, 2023, Pena Justitia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, hal. 58.

Chazawi Adami, 2015, Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan , PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Detik.com,https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5915057/motif-bupati-langkat-bangun-kerangkeng-manusia-di-rumahnya, diakses tanggal 30 Nov, 2023

Edi Suharto, dan Anthon Freddy Susanto, 2015, Kekerasan Terhadap Manusia, Nuansa Cendekia, Bandung

Ihromi T., 2022, Antropologi Hukum, Penerjemahan Sulistyowati, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta

Muhammad Tisna Nugraha “Perbudakan Modern (Modern Slavery) Analisis Sejarah dan Pendidikan” Volume 9 Nomor 1 Juni Tahun 2015. Hal. 22.

Projodikoro Wirjono, 2013, Asas–Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung

Prasetyo Teguh, 2018, Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,

Renggong Ruslan dan Aulia Dyah Ruslan Rachma, 2021, Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional, Kencana, Jakarta

Rahmayanti, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama, Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Vol. 8 No.1 , 2020.

Salle, 2020, Sistem Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum, Social Politic Genius, Makassar

Tirto.id, "Sejarah Perbudakan di Indonesia, Pengertian, dan Contohnya di Dunia", diakses melalui https://tirto.id/gol6, tanggal 20 Novemner 2023, Pukul 18.00 WIB

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang TPPO

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia

Warjiyat Sri. 2018, Memahami Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Konsep Dasar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta

Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana PencabulanTerhadapAnak Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak, Jurnal Hukumpidana& Kriminologi Volume 2 No 2 Oktober 2021.

Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, Peran Unit Ppa Dalam Menerapkan Teori Restorative Justice Pada Tindak Pidana Pencurian Terhadap Pelaku Anak Di Kota Gorontalo, JSEH (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Humaniora) Volume 7 Nomor 2 Desember 2021 (PP. 132-141)

Downloads

Published

2024-04-11

How to Cite

Riki Hamdany, Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, & Rahmayanti, R. (2024). Gross Human Rights Violations Of Slavery And Human Abuse In Cages In Lagkat District (Analysis of Stabat District Court Decision Number 467/Pid.B/2022/PN Stb). International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.999

Issue

Section

Social Science