Juridical Analysis of Foundation Beneficial Owner based on Presidential Regulations Number 13 of 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i1.1086Keywords:
Law, Notary, Beneficial Owner, FoundationAbstract
This thesis aims to analyze the legal conflict between the foundation law and Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 concerning beneficial owners in foundations, where foundations shouldn’t have a beneficial owner. The issues raised are: (1) What’s the juridical analysis of the Criteria for Beneficial Owners of Foundations based on Article 5 of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 from the perspective of the Foundation Law? and (2) What’s the legal certainty regarding Notaries obligations in listing the beneficial owners in the process of ratifying, establishing or changing the foundation's legal entity, based on Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 9 of 2017? Research methods used are statute approach and conceptual approach. Resulting in a conclusion that a foundation doesn’t have a beneficial owner, and legal certainty for notaries remains uncertain. Therefore, this Presidential Decree should be created and aimed at corporations formed as companies, with profit-oriented activities.
References
Adib Bahari. (2010). Prosedur Pendirian Yayasan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Adil, S. K. M. (1955). Pembaharuan Hukum Perdata Kita. Jakarta: PT Pembangunan.
Adjie, H. (2009). Meneropong Khasanah Notaris Dan PPAT Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Adjie, H. (2018). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Ais, C. (2006). Badan Hukum Yayasan (Edisi Revi). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bruno Da Silva. (2017). Evolution of the Beneficial Ownership Concept: More than Half of Century of Uncertainty and What History Can Tell Us, Frontiers of Law in China. 12, 520.
Chidir Ali. (1987). Badan Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Gatot Supramono. (2008). Hukum Yayasan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Gatot Supramono. (2010). Hukum Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Harahap, Y. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata (Cet. Ke-10). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Notodisoerjono, R. S. (1993). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Khusnu Goesniadie. (2010). Harmonisasi Sistem Hukum, Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Malang: NASA Media.
Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: PT. Liberty.
Perusahaan Korporasi: Definisi, Jenis, Ciri, dan Contohnya. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2024, from https://www.ocbc.id/id/article/2023/08/28/perusahaan-korporasi-adalah
Putra, N. N. (2019). KPPU: Sulitnya Melacak Praktik Monopoli di Era Ekonomi Digital, Transparansi Beneficial Owner Kunci Persaingan Sehat di Era Ekonomi Digital, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kppu--sulitnya-melacak-praktik-monopoli-di-era-ekonomidigital-lt59f3452e3555b.%0A
Reinhard-DeRoo, M. (2014). Beneficial Ownership: Basic and Federal Indian Law Aspects of a Concept. Zurich: Springer International.
Rustan. (2023). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: CV Syakir Media Press.
Setiawan. (1992). Aneka masalah Hukum dan Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Alumni.
Soerodjo, H. (1981). Status Hukum Yayasan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Penataan Badan-Badan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta.
Syahuri, T. (2004). Hukum Konstitusi: Proses dan Prosedur Perubahan UUD di Indonesia 1945-2002 serta Perbandingannya dengan Konstitusi Negara Lain Di Dunia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vira Moerdany, Prija Djatmika, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








































