Prospects for the Application of Unexplained Wealth Order in the Forfeiture of Assets Proceeds of Corruption in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i2.1090Abstract
This research focuses on discussing two things, namely (1) how the legal politics of regulating asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia and (2) what are the prospects for applying the unexplained wealth order in asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia. in this study it was found that: first, the legal politics of asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia is still mainly oriented towards the process of asset forfeiture based on conviction, asset forfeiture can only be carried out if there is a judge's decision that is legally binding. However, if in the course of a criminal case there are difficulties in proof, the defendant dies in the judicial process, and after a court decision with permanent legal force it is known that there are assets or assets owned by the perpetrator that are the proceeds of crime, a civil lawsuit can be filed. however, it is different from the concept of unexplained wealth contained in the Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill which has a broader dimension of civil filing. And the filing of a civil lawsuit is not an alternative to the criminal justice process. Asset forfeiture lawsuits through the criminal process can be filed before, during and after criminal judgements, in order to avoid obfuscation and the disappearance and conversion of assets resulting from corruption crimes. Secondly, the prospect of implementing unexplained wealth in Indonesia has existed through the establishment and drafting of the Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill. However, this bill is not equipped with the obligation to reverse the burden of proof, which is identical to the proof of ownership of assets contained in the Anti-Corruption Law. In the future, it is necessary to equalise the reversal of the burden of proof that should be carried out by the owner of the asset to facilitate the proof process and assist the legal apparatus.
References
Ali, Ahmad, (2018) Heryani,Wiwie, Asas- Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata, Kencana Media Press, Jakarta.
Albert, Porajow, DF.,(2010), Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Alternative Memperoleh Kembali Kekayaan Negara yang Hilang Karena Tindak Pidana yang bBerkaitan dengan Perekonomian Negara, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.
Australian Federal Police, “Criminal As Confiscation Taskforce”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Februari 2024, https://www.afp.gov.au/sites/default/files/PDF/CACT-Brochure-a.pdf.
Australian National Audit Office, “Proceeds Of Crime”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Februari 2024, https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/proceeds-crime.Azwar, Muhammad F, Karim,MS, “The Concept of Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Coruption”, Legal Brief, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2022, (Desember, 2022),
Anggita,Astrid B., Dudung Hidayat, “Eksistensi Jaksa Sebagai Pengacara Negara Dalam Melaksanakan Gugatan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti (Studi Kasus Perkara Korupsi di Kabupaten Cirebon)”, Hukum Responsif, Vol.9, No. 2, (Agustus 2018)
Bru, J. Piere, Hauch, Jeane, “Unexplain wealth Orders: Toward a New Frontier in Asset Recovery”, dikunjungi pada 3 Februari 2024, https://star.worldbank.org/publications/unexplained-wealth-orders-toward-new-frontier-asset-recovery.
Criminal Defences Lawyers Australia, “Guide to Explain Wealth in Australia”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Februari 2024, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9e956926-36bf-42bc-946b-79410c08decf.
Direktorat Kekayaan Negara, “Pengelolaan Aset yang Dirampas Melalui Mekanisme Non Conviction Based Asset Forfiture suatu op Perbandiangan Antara Indonesia dan Thailand”, dikunjungi 3 Februari 2024, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/16101/Pengelolaan-Aset-yang-Dirampas-melalui-Mekanisme-Non-Conviction-Based-Asset-Forfeiture-Suatu-Perbandingan-Indonesia-Thailand.html
Divisi Hukum dan Monitoring Peradilan ICW, “Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Korupsi Tahun 2022”, dikunjungi pada 3 Febaruari 2024, https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Tren%20Penindakan%20Tahun%202022.pdf
Fajrin, Yaris A, Triwijaya, AF., “Asset Forfeiture Punishment for Coruptor in the Perspektif of Indonesia’s Social Justice”, Fiat Justitia, Volume 13, Nomor 3, (Juli, 2019)
Fitriyani, Desi, Maizaroh,Muthiah “Posibilitas in Rem Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Asset Recovery di Indonesia”, aml/cft Journal Anti Money Laundering/ Countering the Financing of Terrorism, Vol, 01, No, 02, (2023).
Ginting, Jamin, Perjanjian Internasional Dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 11, No. 2, (September 2011)
Greenbergh, Theodore S., Linda M. Samuel, (2009), A Good Practice fo Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture, The World Bank, Washington Dc.
Gray,Antony Davidson “ Forfeiture Provisions and the Criminal/ Civil Divide, New Criminal Law Review : An International and Interdiciplinary Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1Hariman Satria, “Ke Arah Pergeseran Beban Pembuktian”, Jurnal Integritas, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2017)
Hukum Online, “Hukum Perdata Tak Mengenal Asas Non Retroktif”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 5 Februari 2024, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hukum-perdata-tak-mengenal-nonretroaktif-hol18271/.
Hurd, Heidi, (2010), Unjust Enrichment : A Study of Private Law and Public Laws, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Ifrani, “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa”, Al Adl, Volume IX, No. 3,(Desember 2017
Indonesia Coruption Watch, “Indonesia Harus Atur Norma-Norma UNCAC Untuk Jerat Koruptor Canggih”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 5 Februari 2024, https://www.antikorupsi.org/id/article/indonesia-harus-atur-norma-norma-uncac-untuk-jerat-koruptor-canggih.
Indonesian Coruption Watch, “Naskah Akademik dan RUU Tipikor Usul Inisiatif Masyarakat”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 3 Februari 2024, https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/NA_dan_RUU_Tipikor.pdf
Jaya,Arizon M., (2017), “Implementasi Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Cepalo, 1(1).
King,Colin, “Civil Forfeiture in Ireland: Rwo Decades of the Proceeds of Crime Act and Criminal Asset Bureau”, University Of Sussex, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Febaruari 2024, https://www.dsps.unict.it/sites/default/files/Civil%20forfeiture%20in%20Ireland%20-%202%20decades.pdf
Lilik Mulyadi, Pembuktian Terbalik Kasus Korupsi, https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/upload_file/img/article/doc/pembuktian_terbalik_kasus_korupsi.pdf
Liz Campbell, The Recovery of Criminal Assets in New Zealand, Ireland and England, Edinburg Research Explore, http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2010/2.pdf
LK2I, Melihat Masa Depan Regulasi Illicit Inreachment : Sebuah Ancaman Bagi Pejabat atau Pelanggaran Hak Asasi ?, https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/portfolio/melihat-masa-depan-regulasi-illicit-enrichment-sebuah-ancaman-bagi-pejabat-publik-atau-pelanggaran-hak-asasi/.
Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Unang Tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana, https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_ruu_tentang_perampasan_aset.pdf.
Nugraha, Xavier, Maria, Ave “ Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Formulasi Baru Upaya Stolen Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Majalah Hukum Nasional, Vol. 49, No. 1 (2019).
Romantz, David S.,Civil Forfeiture and The Constitution : A Legislative Abrogation of Right and Judicia Response : The Guilt of the Res, Suffolle University Law Review, Vol 52, Issues No 1.
Saputra, Noverdi P., Politik Hukum dan Muatan Pengaturan Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Tentang Perampasan Aset, Info Singkat DPR RI, Vol. XVI, No. 10
Sagita, Afrianto, (2017), “Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 17 (1),Taniady, Vicko, Riwayanti , Novi W., “Reformulasi Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Berlandaskan Asas Presumption of Guilty Terhadap Kasus TPPU di Indonesia”, IPMHI Law Jurnal, Vol.1, No. 2, (Desember 2021).
Sari, Ayu K., Puspawati,I GA., “ Penerapan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Februari 2024, file:///C:/Users/ASPIRE%203/Downloads/5364-1-8522-1-10-20130501.pdf
Rahayu,Kurnia Yunita, Harbowo, Nikolaus “Kepentingan Politisi Hambat Pembahasan RUU Perampasan Aset”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 3 Februari 2024, https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2023/06/20/kepentingan-politis-hambat-pembahasan-ruu-perampasan-aset
Parlement of Australia, Unexplain wealth Legislation Amandement Bill 2018, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1819a/19bd02.
Parliement of New South Wales, “Unexplain wealth (Common Wealth Powers) Bill 2018”, dikunjungi pada tanggal 3 Febaruari 2024, https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1820781676-77017/link/25
PPATK, Implementasi UNCAC di Indonesia, dikungjungi tanggal 3 Februari 2024, https://ppid.ppatk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/4.19-Naskah-Akademis-Undang-Undang-Perampasan-Aset.pdf
Rahayuningsih, Teotik, Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Perbankan dalam Rangka Pemberntasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, dikunjungi pada tanggal 2 Febaruari 2024, file:///C:/Users/ASPIRE%203/Downloads/693-1531-1-SM.pdf.
The Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet Rule, dikunjungi pada 4 februari 2024, https://www.lawteacher.net/
Yayasan LembagaBantuan Hukum Indonesia, Illicit Inrechment, https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/YLBHI_PPT%2520Illicit%2520Enrichment-Alvon.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ikhwanulhakim hakim, Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Yuliati Yuliati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.