Legal Review Of Death Penalty Sanctions And Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Crimes Reviewed From The Perspective Of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i2.1299Keywords:
Death Penalty Sanctions,, Asset Confiscation,, Corruption,, Justice PerspectiveAbstract
The crime of corruption in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, which was later updated by Law Number 20 Year 2001. This research aims to legally discuss the application of death penalty and asset forfeiture in corruption cases, by considering the principle of justice. The research uses a normative juridical method, in which data is collected from various applicable legal regulations, and the results are presented descriptively-analytically. Although the death penalty is regulated in Indonesian positive law, until now its implementation in corruption cases has never been realized. As a result, the applicable law has not fully provided an adequate sense of justice for the state and the people harmed by acts of corruption. On the other hand, the Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU) as an effort to recover state losses has been proposed. Asset forfeiture as an additional criminal offense is already regulated in Article 10 letter (b) of the Criminal Code. While the death penalty is the main punishment, both have different implementation procedures, but both aim to realize justice. Both the death penalty and asset forfeiture are expected to have a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption and reduce the number of corruption crimes in Indonesia.
References
Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2).
Andini, M. (2019). Keadilan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Teori Thomas Aquinas.
Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan. Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Husein, Y. (2010). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 7(4).
Jaya, A. M. (2017). Implementasi Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Implementation of Asset Deprivation of Criminal Act of Corruption). Cepalo, 1(1), 21–30.
La Ode, Y., & Yulestari, R. R. (2024). Optimalisasi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Pada Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi. JUDICATUM: Jurnal Dimensi Catra Hukum, 2(1), 1-20.
Latumaerissa, D. (2014). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Penerapan Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sasi, 20(1), 8-18.
Najib, M. A. (2023). Polemik Pengesahan Rancang Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, 3(2), 159-175.
Prakoso, J. (1988). Indonesia’s Penitentiary Law. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Pranoto, A., Darmo, A. B., & Hidayat, I. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Perampasan Aset Korupsi Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 91-121.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Cetakan Ke Â, 11.
Suranta, F. A. (2010). Peranan PPATK dalam mencegah terjadinya praktik money laundering. (No Title).
Tantimin, T. (2021). Legal Liability of Minors as Perpetrators of Online Buying and Selling Fraud in Indonesia. Law Reform, 17(2), 145–156.
Utrecht, E. (1987). Hukum Pidana II (Cetakan Ketiga). Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas.
Yanto, O. (2017). Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Pelaku Tindak Pidanakorupsi Dalam Keadaan Tertentu (Death Penalty To Corruptors In A Certain Condition). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(0), 49–56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sukamto Kusnadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.