The Evidence Of Seal Breaking Or Safety Sign In Crime Of Customs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i5.137Keywords:
Analysis of Evidence, Vandalism, CrimeAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the proof of damage to seals or security signs in customs crimes at Gorontalo customs and excise office and to find out what factors influence the proof of damage to seals in customs crimes at Gorontalo customs and excise office. Implementation This research is doctrinal legal research, namely research that provides systematic exposure to regulations governing certain legal categories, analyzes the relationship between regulations, explains areas that experience obstacles, and predicts future developments. The forms of proof of the crime of destroying the seal or security sign in the customs sector can be carried out by importers, exporters, law enforcement officers, entrepreneurs managing customs services, by legal entities, and individuals. Customs crimes can cause losses to the state, so prevention and law enforcement efforts, especially the application of criminal sanctions, are a means that can prevent and eradicate customs crimes. To prevent the occurrence of other forms of criminal acts in the customs sector, especially the destruction of security seals/signs, it is necessary to coordinate and cooperate between government agencies and law enforcement officers as well as the community to carry out supervision in the form of monitoring all customs activities and evaluating and reporting and taking action if there are activities. which violates Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 10 of 1995 concerning Customs. For the Government to establish a special prison or detention center for perpetrators of the crime of breaking the security seal in Gorontalo province at the Customs and Excise Office of Gorontalo, to facilitate the investigation process. And without the participation of the community, law enforcement will not be achieved optimally, public awareness to obey the law is very much needed and increases the role model for the community itself
References
Adrian Sutedi, 2012, Aspects of Customs Law, Sinar Graphic, Jakarta
Ali Purwito, 2007, Customs Reform, Law Number 17 of 2006 in Lieu of Law Number 10 of 1995 concerning Customs, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta
Aziz Syamsuddin, Special Crimes, (Editor) Tarmizi, Ed. 1. Cet.1, Sinar Graphic, Jakarta, 2011
M. Yahya Harahap. 2008. Discussion of Problems and Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code: Examination of the Court, Appeal, Cassation, and Review. Second Edition. Jakarta. Graphic Ray.
R. Subekti, 2008. Law of Evidence. Jakarta. Pradnya Paramita.
Reza Ongkie Baris, Journal of the application of criminal sanctions according to Number 17 of 2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 10 of 1995 concerning Customs, Lex Crimen Vol. VII/No. 4/Jun/2018
Soerjono, Soekanto. 2011. Factors Affecting Law Enforcement. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Tongat, 2009, Basics of Indonesian Criminal Law in Renewal Perspective, UMM Press, Malan
Tiyas Intan Permata Sari, Kadarisman Hidayat, Arief Setyawan, Journal of the Effect of Import Duties and Taxes in the Context of Imports (BM and PDRI) on Total Revenue (Study at the Office of Supervision and Service of Customs and Excise, Malang Intermediate Type for the Period of 2011-2015), Journal Taxation(Trail)| Vol. 10 No. 12016
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2014, Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung
RI Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping
https://repository.widyatama.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3838/Bab%202.p ?sequence=6 (accessed on 1 Feb 2020)
Interview with Mr. Moh. Thaib Usma000000n as the presenter of data on enforcement and junior operational facilities at the customs office C Gorontalo on 20 Feb 2020.
Interview with the Head of the Intelligence Subsection of the Customs and Excise Service Office of Intermediate Type C Gorontalo, Mr. Adi Amirullah. May 25, 2020. 2:30 p.m








































