Reformulation of Investigation Arrangements On Corruption In Law No. 31 of 1997 on Military Justice In Indonesia

Novalia Pertiwi; Nurini Aprilianda; Faizin Sulistyo

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1414

Authors

Novalia Pertiwi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Nurini Aprilianda Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Faizin Sulistyo Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1414

Keywords:

Reformulation, Corruption, Military Justice in Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the reformulation of the regulation of investigation of corruption committed by members of the military within the framework of Law No. 31 of 1997 on Military Justice. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the urgency of the KPK's involvement in the investigation of military corruption cases and to formulate a more effective reformulation of legal arrangements. This study uses the type of normative research with reference to the theory of justice, the theory of legal certainty, and the theory of Criminal Law Policy, using the approach of legislation (Statute Approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on the results of research conducted by the author shows that the involvement of the KPK can increase the transparency and effectiveness of law enforcement in cases of military corruption. Furthermore, because the existing military justice system has not been fully able to handle the complexity of corruption, especially due to the lack of involvement of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the investigation process. thus, reformulation is needed to create an investigation system that is more fair, responsive, and consistent with the principle of "equality before the law", by adding a special provision in the military justice law that explicitly regulates the investigation of corruption committed by members of the military by including the role of the KPK in regulating the investigation of corruption. With this change, the investigation process runs more transparently and reduces the potential for conflicts of interest that may arise when military institutions investigate corruption cases in their own environment while law enforcement for corruption crimes in the military environment is expected to run more comprehensively, and strengthen the integrity of State defense institutions.

References

Abdi Rahmansyah, Tinjaun Yuridis Tentang Kewenangan Penyidikan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Skripsi, FH. UNRAM, 2018

Agus Yudha Handoko, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Kencana Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta: 2010.

Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta:

Baharudin Lopa, Kejahatan Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum, Kompas,2001

Barda Nawwi Arief, Kebijakan legisatif dalam penanggulangan kejahatan dengan pidana penjara, Disertasi, (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1994)

Deni Styawati, KPK Pemburu Koruptor, Cet I, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Timur, 2018

Djaja Ermansjah, Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK, Ed. Tarmidzi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022

Dominikus Rato, Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum,Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta, 2010

IGM. Nurdjana, Drs, SH,M.Hum, dkk, Korupsi & Illegal Logging Dalam Sistem Desentralisasi, Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2005.

I Made Pasek Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Kencana Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta: 2017.

J.E. Sahetapy dan B. Mardjono Reksodiputro, Paradoks dalam kriminologi, CV Rajawali, Jakarta 1983.

Marwan Efendi, Posisi dan fungsinya dalam Perspektif Hukum, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2020

M. Ali Zaidan, Kebijakan Kriminal, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016,

mirudin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Pertama (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004)

Ninik Widiyanti dan Yilus Waskita, Kejahatan Dalam Masyarakat Dan Pencegahannya, Jakarta, 1987, Bima Aksara.

PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta: 2010.

---------------, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi ,Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2010

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012

Soerjono Soekanto, Metodelogi hukum, universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 1994.

---------------, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 1994.

Tri Agung Kristanto & Irwan Suhanda, “Jangan Bunuh KPK, Perlawanan Terhadap Usaha Pemberantasan Korupsi” Jakarta: Kompas, 2009

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang KUHAP.

Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer.

Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana KorupsiWanda Rara Farezha, “Analisis Putusan Hakim Praperadilan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (Studi Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 14/Pid. Pra/2016/PN. Tjk)” (2017) 5:3 JURNAL POENALE.

W.a Bonger, Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi, Pembangunan Dan Ghalia Indonesia, 1982