Analysis of The Three Main Categories of Defense Industrial Policy  In Law No. 16 Of 2012

Wira Iqomudin Akhyar; G. Royke Deksino; Jupriyanto Jupriyanto

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1419

Authors

Wira Iqomudin Akhyar Republic of Indonesia Defense University
G. Royke Deksino Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jupriyanto Jupriyanto Republic of Indonesia Defense University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1419

Abstract

The main problems in defense industrial policy relate to issues of strength, prestige and prosperity. The defense industry policy instrument in Law No. 16 of 2012 projects policy direction in three main aspects. This article aims to analyze the three main categories of the defense industry in the form of procurement, research and development as well as export regulations for defense industry products in Law No. 16 of 2012. The research method uses qualitative methods. The analysis orientation uses a conceptual approach and legal regulations. The results found explain that the policy direction in the three main categories of the defense industry is in line with import substitution and export promotion policies. Fulfillment of defense industry legal instruments is based on fifteen principles that bind the policy. Defense industrial policy options are commonly used in developing the defense industry of developed countries in the world. The main principle of policy objectives leads to technological innovation schemes for security and defense equipment. The implications of the chosen policy can move the value chain of defense industry products and open up new job opportunities.

References

Arhan, Muhammad Rizki, Djoko Andreas Navalino, and Yusuf Ali. 2022. “Akuisisi Pertahanan Dan Ekspor Senjata Pasca Revisi Uu Industri Pertahanan Dalam Omnibus Law Serta Potensi Dan Kerawanannya Bagi Ekonomi Pertahanan.” Jurnal Cafetaria 3 (1): 105–12.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2012. Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pidana Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Semarang: Pustaka Magister Semarang.

Berkok, U, C Penney, and K Skogstad. 2012. “Defence Industrial Policy Approaches and Instruments.” Kingston, Canada: Queen’s …, no. July. http://aerospacereview.ca/eic/site/060.nsf/vwapj/Def_Ind_Pol_Approaches_-_Final_Draft_-_July_13.pdf/$FILE/Def_Ind_Pol_Approaches_-_Final_Draft_-_July_13.pdf.

Farhan, Moh Fakhruddin, Fiorentina Nulhakim, Hadi Sulistiyo, Hazen Alrasyid, Nadia Aurora Soraya, and Kristina Virgin Ayu. 2023. “Strategi Industri Pertahanan Dalam Mendukung Pertahanan Negara.” Jurnal Mirai Management 8 (1): 169–78.

Montratama, Ian. 2018. “Bagi Industri Pertahanan Indonesia Optimizing Strategy of Defense Equipment Procurement for Indonesian Defense Industries.” Pertahanan 4:79–98.

N. R. Afifi, I. B. Jandhana, and K. . 2021. “‘PERUBAHAN LANDASAN HUKUM INDUSTRI PERTAHANAN : UU INDUSTRI PERTAHANAN VS OMNIMBUS LAW’, , Vol. 10, No. 1, Pp. 223-227, Dec. 2021.” JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT 10, n:223–27.

Rasyida, Avira Durrotul, I Nengah Putra Apriyanto, and George Royke Deksino. 2022. “Perkembangan Kebijakan Industri Pertahanan Indonesia.” Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia 2 (1): 146–52. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v2i1.59.

Rusdiana, Dede, Yusuf Ali, Suyono Thamrin, and Resmanto Widodo. 2021. “Strategi Pembangunan Industri Pertahanan Pada Negara Kepulauan Guna Mendukung Pertahanan Negara.” Jurnal Academia Praja 4 (2): 427–40. https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v4i2.629.

Susdarwono, Endro Tri, Ananda Setiawan, and Nurul Yonimah Husna. 2020. “Kebijakan Negara Terkait Perkembangan Dan Revitalisasi Industri Pertahanan Indonesia Dari State Policies Relating To The Development And Revitalization Of The Indonesian Defence Industry.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3 (1): 155–81.

U. Silalahi, Metode Penelitian Sosial, Cetakan ke. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2012.