The Notary's Responsibility for the Validity of Legalization of a Deed Under Hand Signed Without the Presence of the Parties (Case Study of Decision No. 146/PDT/2018/PT YYK)

Authors

  • Fatmawaty Arkani Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University
  • Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
  • Novita Dian Phra Harini Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1424

Keywords:

Notary's Responsibility, Legalization, Validity of Deeds

Abstract

This research aims to examine the responsibilities of notaries in the legalization of private documents signed without the presence of the related parties. The primary focus is the analysis of Decision No. 146/PDT/2018/PT YYK, which highlights issues concerning the validity of the legalization of a land sale and purchase deed involving forged signatures. This study underscores Indonesian civil law regulations and the Notary Law (UUJN), which mandate that all parties involved in private documents must be present before the notary during the legalization process. The research adopts a normative juridical method with a conceptual, statutory, case-based, and comparative approach. The findings reveal that the legalization process conducted without the presence of all parties violates legal procedures and may compromise the validity of the document. Furthermore, the accountability of notaries who fail to comply with these procedures is not explicitly regulated under the UUJN or the code of ethics, creating potential risks for misuse. This study recommends the establishment of stricter regulations regarding sanctions for negligent notaries to ensure compliance with the law and protect the legal interests of all parties involved.

References

Abdillah, S., Ghapa, N., & Makhtar, M. (2023). A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Malaysia on the Role of Notaries and Advocates. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 6(3), 943. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7853

Abida, R. D., & Irham, R. R. (2021). TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP WAARMERKING AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN YANG PEMBUATANNYA DIBANTU OLEH NOTARIS. Education And Development, 9(1), 154–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i1.2328

Adjie, H. (2008a). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. PT. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2008b). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2009). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. PT. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2017a). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2017b). Memahami dan Menerapkan Covernote, Legalisasi, Waarmerking dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2022). Memahami dan menerapkan covernote, legalisasi, waarmerking dalam pelaksanaan tugas jaatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, A. (2006a). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2006b). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Bachruddin. (2021). Hukum Kenotariatan Perlindungan Hukum dan Jaminan Bagi Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum dan Warga Negara (cetakan 1). Thema Publishing.

Bachrudin. (2019). Hukum Kenotariatan Teknik Pembuatan Akta dan Bahasa Akta, (. Refika Aditama.

Deen, T., Victoria, O. A., & Sumain, S. (2018). Public Notary Services In Malaysia. Jurnal Akta, 5(4), 1017. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i4.4135

Divia Fitcanisa, J., & Azheri, B. (2023). KEABSAHAN TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK PADA AKTA NOTARIS. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 2(5), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.809

HS, S. (2018). Peraturan jabatan notaris. Sinar Grafika.

Karsayuda, M. R., Fadli, M., Khusaini, M., & Kusumaningrum, A. (2023). Legal Construction of Infrastructure Financing Based on Public Private Partnership to Realize National Resilience. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i1.563

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi revisi (Cetakan ke-14). Kencana.

Maulana, I., Fadli, M., Herlindah, H., & Permadi, I. (2024). Pengaturan Jangka Waktu Yang Berkeadilan Atas Perjanjian Kerjasama Kepada Pihak Ketiga Hak Pengelolaan Diatas Tanah Ulayat. Tunas Agraria, 7(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i3.352

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. MATARAM UNIVERSITY PRESS.

Napouling, D. (2022). Pemberhentian Dengan Tidak Hormat Bagi Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana (Studi Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat Nomor: 18/B/MPPN/XII/2017). Indonesian Notary, 4(2), 1300–1323. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss2/18/?utm_source=scholarhub.ui.ac.id%2Fnotary%2Fvol4%2Fiss2%2F18&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Notary Public Malaysia Koo Chin Nam. (n.d.). In Malaysia, the powers of notaries public are governed by the Notaries Public Act 1959. Https://Www.Notarypublicmalaysia.Com/Our-Services/.

Nurkharisma, D., Ispriyarso, B., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2020a). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PERJANJIAN DIBAWAH TANGAN YANG TELAH DILEGALISASI YANG MENGANDUNG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM. NOTARIUS, 13(2), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31122

Nurkharisma, D., Ispriyarso, B., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2020b). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP PERJANJIAN DIBAWAH TANGAN YANG TELAH DILEGALISASI YANG MENGANDUNG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM. NOTARIUS, 13(2), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31122

Nurliyantika, R., Ruslan, R. A. bt M., Rumesten, I., Ramadhan, M. S., & Adisti, N. A. (2022). Studi Komparasi Tugas Dan Wewenang Notaris Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia. Repertorium Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(2), 196–207.

Pramono, D. (2015). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 12(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v12i3.1225

Puspa, W. T., Harjono, H., & Winarno, D. W. (2016). Tanggungjawab Notaris terhadap Kebenaran Akta Dibawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi oleh Notaris. Jurnal Repertorium, III(2), 154–163. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/213250-tanggungjawab-notaris-terhadap-kebenaran.pdf

Soeroso, R. (2010). Perjanjian di bawah tangan : Pedoman praktis pembuatan dan aplikasi hukum. Sinar Grafika .

Thamrin, H., & Khoidin, M. (2021). Hukum Notariat Dan Pertanahan (Kewenangan Notaris dan PPAT Membuat Akta Pertanahan (I. Soerodjo, Ed.; cetakan 1). Laksbang Justicia.

Wardhani, S. A., & Julianti, N. M. (2020). TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP LEGALISASI AKTA DIBAWAH TANGAN. Kerta Dyatmika, 17(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46650/kd.17.2.985.45-55

Wibisono, R. A. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Keabsahan Akta Otentik Yang Memakai Surrogate Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10398–10406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1876

Yusrizal, K. (2008). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Di Bawah Tangan Dihubungkan Dengan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pasal 15 Ayat (2) Uu Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Universitas Diponegoro.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Arkani, F., Masykur, M. H. ., & Harini, N. D. P. . (2024). The Notary’s Responsibility for the Validity of Legalization of a Deed Under Hand Signed Without the Presence of the Parties (Case Study of Decision No. 146/PDT/2018/PT YYK). International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1424