Legal Implications of Examining Notarial Original of the Deed in Corruption Cases: Procedural Analysis and Barriers to Law Enforcement

Ananda Kukuh Wicaksono; Abdul Madjid; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1465

Authors

Ananda Kukuh Wicaksono Mahasiswa Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Abdul Madjid Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1465

Keywords:

Criminal Act of Corruption, Legal Implications, Notary Honorary Council, Original of the deed

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the application of Article 36 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Original of the deed as evidence in corruption criminal cases and the legal implications if investigators fail to obtain permission from the Honorary Council of Notaries to examine the Original of the deed. This study employs a normative juridical research method, using both the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, which include Article 66 of Law Number 2 of 2014 amending Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary and Article 36 of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as well as secondary legal sources, including relevant publications related to the issues raised in this study. These legal materials are analyzed using a perspective analysis, employing grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The research findings indicate that, based on Article 36 of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, which regulates investigations and prosecutions of corruption offenses, there is no legal certainty in its application due to the involvement of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office and the Honorary Council of Notaries or sectoral ego within each institution. The legal implication of failing to grant investigators permission to examine the Original of the deed of the Honorary Council of Notaries is that it prevents the achievement of perfect proof, as the Original of the deed holds a perfect evidentiary value in proving the alleged corruption crime.

References

Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Refika Aditama.

Ardianta, I. G. M., Munandar, A., & Djumardin, D. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Hak Ingkar Notaris Terhadap Kerahasiaan Isi Minuta Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Uujnp Dan Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i2.150

Fara Difah, Z. P., Wisnaeni, F., & Sukma, N. M. (2021). Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Merahasiakan Isi Akta Melalui Hak Ingkar Notaris. Notarius, 14(2), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43805

Fidhira, F., Ryan Bakry, M., & Yusuf, C. (2021). GAGASAN HAK INGKAR DALAM PELAKSANAAN JABATAN NOTARIS DI INDONESIA: STUDI ANALISIS DAMPAK PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 49/PUU.X/2012. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v12i1.1916

Harahap, Y. M. (2008). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan). Sinar Grafika.

Hika Deriya Fajar Rizki Asril Putra. (2022). PENERAPAN HAK INGKAR NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Putusan Nomor 685/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Mlg). The Juris, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i1.411

Ibrahim, T. R. P. (2020). KEWENANGAN TERHADAP PENYITAAN MINUTA AKTA SEBAGAI BARANG BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA [Tesis]. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Junita Sari, E. (2022). Implementasi Hukum Hak Ingkar Notaris Terhadap Kerahasiaan Isi Akta Notaris. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 2(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art8

Karsayuda, M. R., Fadli, M., Khusaini, M., & Kusumaningrum, A. (2023). Legal Construction of Infrastructure Financing Based on Public Private Partnership to Realize National Resilience. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i1.563

Mahmud, A. (2020). URGENSI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PROGRESIF UNTUK MENGEMBALIKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.256-271

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi revisi (Cetakan ke-14). Kencana.

Permanasari, R., & Khisni, A. (2018). Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2528

Priandhana, A. R. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris dalam Proses Penyidikan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 16/PUU-XVIII/2020). Indonesian Notary, 3(1), 730–753. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss1/12?utm_source=scholarhub.ui.ac.id%2Fnotary%2Fvol3%2Fiss1%2F12&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Rumadan, I. (2017a). PERAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN SEBAGAI INSTITUSI PENEGAK HUKUM DALAM MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN BAGI TERWUJUDNYA PERDAMAIAN. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.128

Rumadan, I. (2017b). PERAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN SEBAGAI INSTITUSI PENEGAK HUKUM DALAM MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN BAGI TERWUJUDNYA PERDAMAIAN. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.128

S, L. A. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak dalam Perspektif Pancasila dan Bela Negara. UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v5i1.754

Saifulloh, Moh. R. (2022). Examination and Confiscation of Notarial Deeds for The Purpose of Criminal Law Enforcement without Approval from The Notary Honorary Council. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 423. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.423-436

Salamah, S., & Iriantoro, A. (2022). PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DAN TANGGUNGJAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MEMBUAT AKTA BERDASARKAN PASAL 16 AYAT (1) HURUF a UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 457 PK/Pdt/2019). Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan, 1(2), 540–574.

SALSABILA, A. D. A., SUHARININGSIH, S., & NAVIANTO, I. (2018). HAK INGKAR NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p008

Simanjuntak, K. W. (2019). Pengambilan Minuta Akta Dan Pemanggilan Notaris Serta Hak Ingkar Notaris Berdasarkan Sumpah Jabatan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan. JUSTISI, 5(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v5i1.538

Sonata, D. L. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283

Widhasani, I. A. M., & Latumeten, P. E. (2022). PENGGUNAAN HAK INGKAR NOTARIS TERKAIT DENGAN KEWAJIBAN MELAKSANAKAN RAHASIA JABATAN. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v6i2.1525