Testing the Legitimacy of Marriage Dispensation Determination: a Perspective of the Theory of Legality By Philipus M. Hadjon

Sabrina Amaliya Lutfiana; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih; Shinta Hadiyantina

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1516

Authors

Sabrina Amaliya Lutfiana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Shinta Hadiyantina Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1516

Keywords:

Urgent Reasons, Supporting Evidence, Marriage Dispensation, Validity of Judge's Determination

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of the determination related to marriage dispensation applications in the realm of state administrative law. In addition, to evaluate the implementation of the "very urgent reasons" and "sufficient supporting evidence" clauses in the court's determination, as well as to provide recommendations for judges to be more consistent in considering the psychological health aspects of children as stipulated in PERMA Number 5 of 2019. The research method used is normative with a legislative approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach, with secondary data that will be analyzed prescriptively. This study concludes that Judges as government officials must act within the framework of the principle of legality to ensure that every decision taken is legally valid and protect the best interests of children in accordance with broader legal objectives by applying the general principles of good governance (AUPB) in exercising their authority. Based on the analysis of the determination above, it can be seen that the three determinations of the marriage dispensation application are based on the reason of "love". However, these reasons do not meet the elements of very urgent reasons, especially the four determinations are also not accompanied by sufficient evidence, namely evidence that supports the very urgent reason for the marriage, so that the granting of an application for marriage dispensation is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 Paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law and does not meet the aspects of substance and procedure in the theory of validity of Philipus M. Hadjon. Therefore, it is necessary to amend Article 7 Paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law and PERMA Number 5 of 2019 related to the obligation to attach evidence of physical and psychological health officially in order to realize a consistent determination in the application for marriage dispensation

References

Addink, Henk. Good Governance: Concept and Context. I. The United States of America: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Agama, Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan. “Kumpulan Dataset Perkara Peradilan Agama.” Jakarta, n.d. https://kinsatker.badilag.net/Pencarian_smart/direktoriDataset_jenis/362.

Agustian, Sanggup Leonard. “Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Sebagai Batu Uji Bagi Hakim Dalam Memutus Sengketa Peradilan Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus 2, no. 2 (2019): 149. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2370.

Angel, Rose Benedict, and Mia Hadiati. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Kepentingan Anak Dalam Mengabulkan Dispensasi Perkawinan Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019” 6, no. 1 (2023): 3680–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.

Anggoro, F N. “Revitalisasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Untuk Mewujudkan Birokrasi Yang Berkelas Dunia.” Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan 5, no. 1 (2022): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.35326/kybernan.v5i1.2037.

Anggriani, Desi. “Implementasi Dispensasi Kawin Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif (Analisis Penetapan Perkara No.18/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Bn).” Tesis, no. 18 (2019): 1–120.

Anggun Anugrah, Tirana, and Ayu Izza Elvany. “The Disclosure of Sexual Assault on Social Media in Indonesia: A Criminal Law Perspective.” KnE Social Sciences 2023 (2023): 699–705. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i9.13383.

Dewi, Siti Malaiha, Rahayu Rahayu, Kismartini Kismartini, and Tri Yuniningsih. “Pencegahan Perkawinan Dini Dan Sirri Melalui Collaborative Governance Berbasis Gender Di Kabupaten Pati Berbasis Gender Di Kabupaten Pati.” PALASTREN Jurnal Studi Gender 12, no. 2 (2019): 519. https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v12i2.6357.

Disemadi, Hari Sutra. “Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies.” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. 2 (2022): 289. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280.

Dwi, Har bagir manan dan Susi. “Konstusi Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagir Manan Dan Susi Dwi Harijan.” Al Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 3 (1945): 448–67.

Efendi, Jonaedi. Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum Dan Rasa Keadilan Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat. Prenadamedia Group. 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018. http://eprints.ubhara.ac.id/1492/%0Ahttp://eprints.ubhara.ac.id/1492/6/Isi Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim.pdf.

Eleanora, Fransiska Novita, and Andang Sari. “Pernikahan Anak Usia Dini Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Perlindungan Anak.” PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v14i1.1485.

Fathullah. “Dilema Pengaturan Dispensasi Kawin Di Indonesia (Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Dan PERMA NO 5 Tahun 2019),” no. 5 (2021): 85–149.

Hadi, Syofyan. “Principles of Defense (Rechtmatigheid) In Decision Standing of State Administration.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 5, no. 2 (2018): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v5i2.7096.

Hidayat, Arif, Universitas Sunan, Giri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Wakid Evendi, Universitas Sunan, Giri Surabaya, et al. “Dispensasi Kawin Dengan Alasan Sangat Mendesak Di Mojokerto: Analisis Yuridis Atas Perma No. 5 Tahun 2019” 16, no. 2 (2024): 483–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9416.

Kurniawan, Indra. “Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintah Dalam Menerapkan Diskresi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara & Hukum Administrasi Negara 2, no. 2 (2023): 251–64. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.grondwet.id/index.php/gr/article/view/22.

M. Syuib. “Kewenangan Hakim Menerapkan Diskresi Dalam Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (2018): 436. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v2i2.4747.

Muhammad, Ridwan, Irham Rosyidi, and Nam Rumkel. “Normative Analysis of Unlawful Acts of State Administrative Officials Related to the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions (Case Study of Ambon State Administrative Court Decision Number: 10/G/2015/PTUN.ABN By the Mayor of Tidore Islands).” International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others 4, no. 4 (2021): 674–83. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5747017.

Murni, Sri. “The Marriage Age Limit According to Indonesian Law No. 16, 2019 as Effort to Child Protection” 140, no. 16 (2020): 222–30. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.047.

Nur, Sri, and Hari Susanto. “Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan.” Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal 3, no. 3 (2020): 2621–2781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i3.430%20%20-%20%20441.

Perangin-angin, Ita Iya Pulina, Rahayu, and Nuswantoro Dwiwarno. “KEWAJIBAN DAN TANGGUNGJAWAB NEGARA MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEREMPUAN KORBAN REVENGE PORN DI INDONESIA Ita Iya Pulina Perangin-Angin *, Rahayu , Nuswantoro Dwiwarno Program Studi S1 Ilmu Hukum , Fakultas Hukum , Universitas Diponegoro Volume.” Diponegoro Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2019): 457–83. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.25345.

Pietersz, Jemmy Jefry. “Prinsip Good Governance Dalam Penyalahgunaan Wewenang.” Sasi 23, no. 2 (2018): 167. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.107.

Priono, Agus, Widodo T. Novianto, and I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani. “PENERAPAN TEORI PENAFSIRAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS (Studi Atas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 5, no. 2 (2017): 117–30. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i2.18260.

Rosyaadah, Rifa’, and Rahayu Rahayu. “PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PEREMPUAN TERHADAP KASUS KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (Protection of Women’s Human Rights Against Cases of Households Violence in Indonesia Based on the Perspective of Intern.” Jurnal HAM 12, no. 2 (2021): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.261-272.

Sanjaya, Umar Haris, and Dita Fadillah Putri. “Konstruksi Legitimasi Dan Akibat Perkawinan Dibawah Tangan : Mengulang Kawin Atau Itsbat Nikah ?” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 31, no. September (2024): 490–511. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss3.art1.

Schoolmedia, Eko. “Indonesia Peringkat Empat Kasus Kawin Anak Di Dunia, 25,52 Juta Anak Menikah Usia Dini.” Schoolmedia News, 2023. https://news.schoolmedia.id/lipsus/Indonesia-Peringkat-Empat-Kasus-Kawin-Anak-di-Dunia-2552-Juta-Anak-Menikah-Usia-Dini-3898.

Solechan, Solechan. “Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Pelayanan Publik.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 3 (2019): 541–57. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i3.541-557.

Spaltani, Bita Gadsia, Adi Sulistiyono, and Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto. “Pelembagaan Upaya Administrasi Dalam Rangka Perbaikan Birokrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia.” Journal of Contemporary Public Administration (JCPA) 3, no. 2 (2023): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.22225/jcpa.3.2.2023.83-90.

Sriono, Sriono, Anis Mashdurohatun, Sri Kusriyah, and Ahmad Rofiq. “Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Regulations in the Perspective of Human Rights Based on the Value of Justice.” Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 6, no. 04 (2023): 225–33. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i04.005.

Sumiarni, Endang, and Anny Retnowati. Kebijakan Hukum Untuk Mengatasi Penyelundupan Hukum (Studi Pada Perkawinan MModus Menghindari Pidana Dalam Kasus Persetubuhan Dan Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak). Cahaya Atma Pustaka. Yogyakarta, 2017.

Wibowo, Heribertus Rinto, Muliani Ratnaningsih, Nicholas J. Goodwin, Derry Fahrizal Ulum, and Emilie Minnick. “One Household, Two Worlds: Differences of Perception towards Child Marriage among Adolescent Children and Adults in Indonesia.” The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific 8 (2021): 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100103.

Widiyanto, Asfa, Siti Zumrotun, and Heru Saputra. “THE PREVENTION OF UNDERAGE MARRIAGE IN INDONESIA : State , Religious Authority , and Human Rights” 21, no. 2 (2024): 401–22. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i2.9771.

Yanova, Muhammad hendri, Parman Komarudin, and Hendra Hadi. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum Dengan Metode Penelitian Normatif Dan Empiris.” Badamai Law Journal Magister Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat 8,