Analysis Of Mathematics Student Error To Solve Problems Of Linear Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i5.156Keywords:
Error Analysis, Problem Solving, Linear Programming.Abstract
The goal of this research is to describe the analysis of mathematics students error to solve problem of linear programs. This research belongs to the type of qualitative research with using a descriptive approach. The data collection technique is done by giving tests in the form of linear program story questions and interviews. This study used in fifth semester of the students of mathematics of Pahlawan University. The results showed that the types of conceptual errors are: a) making graphic error solution, b) error in using the concept of a variable that will be used, c) identify what is asked and d) choosing error symbol. Procedural errors are: a) error in choosing the strategy to be used in problem solving, b) error in apply strategy to solve the problem, and c) error in viewing return what is the solution obtained is in accordance with what known and asked. Causative factor students make mistakes in solving program problems linear: a) Students are not accustomed to solving story problems so that students have difficulty transform into a mathematical model b) Students do not understand the concept of symbols inequalities c) Students are less proficient at making graphs including determining the area completion d) Students do not understand the concept of extreme points e) Students are less thorough in performing calculation operations
References
Anala, N. C., Uno, H. B., & Kaluku, A. (2021). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Matematika pada Materi Operasi Bilangan Bulat di SMP Negeri 4 Gorontalo.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arief, U. W. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pokok Bahasan Program Linear dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas IV MI DDI Kalukuang Kec. Tallo Kota Makassar Sulawesi Selatan. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.
Ba’ru, Y., & Remme, B. V. (2019). Penerapan Metode Grafik Dalam Merencanakan Produksi Kue Ibu Patrisia di Rantelemo. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 21–25.
Freudenthal (1991). Revisting Mathematics Education (China: Kluwer Academic Lectures).
Gravemeijer, Koeno. (1994). Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute.
Fauzan A 2002 Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Teaching Geometry In Indonesian.
In Primary Schools (Online) (http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download /pdf/11462400.pdf)
Hasratuddin. (2015). Mengapa harus belajar matematika?. Medan: Perdana Publishing.
Hendriana, Heris. (2018). Hard skills dan soft skills matematik siswa. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Hudoyo, Herman. 2001. Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Universitas Negeri Malang: Malang.
Kartika, Y. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis peserta didik kelas vii smp pada materi bentuk aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(2), 777-785.
Maure, Y. L., Djong, K. D., & Dosinaeng, W. B. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Matematik Siswa Sma Pada Materi Program Linear. Asimtot: Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 2(1), 47-56.
NCTM. (2000). Principlesand standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve It (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prence University Press.Puspendik. (2016). Hasil TIMSS Indonesia tahun 2015. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan.
Winarni, E. S. & dan Harmini, S. (2017).Matematika untuk PGSD. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.