Analysis Of The Plaintiff's Lawsuit For The Defendant's Unlawful Act To Control The Rights To Land Owned By Another Person Which Was Rejected By The Rokan Hilir State Court (Niet Onvankelijk Verklaard) For Ne Bis In Idem Reasons Based On May Ruling Number

Jhonni Simanjuntak; Sriono Sriono; Nimrot Siahaan

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1564

Authors

Jhonni Simanjuntak Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
Sriono Sriono Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
Nimrot Siahaan Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1564

Keywords:

Lawsuit, Plaintiff, Unlawful Act, Defendant Land Rights, Rejected (Niet Onvankelijk Verklaard), Ne Bis In Idem

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the Defendant's Unlawful Acts in the Plaintiff's Land Rights Dispute Rejected by the Rokan Hilir District Court (Niet Onvankelijk Verklaard) Due to NeBis In Idem Reasons based on Supreme Court Decision Number: 4348 K/Pdt/2022 and Decision Number 42/Pdt.G/2023/PN Rhl). The type of research used is normative legal research. Discussion Results: the lawsuit dated September 22, 2023 which was received and registered at the Rokan Hilir District Court Clerk's Office on September 25, 2023 with Registration Number 42/Pdt.G/2023/PN Rhl, cannot be accepted (niet ontvankelijke verklaard) by the judge for several reasons, including: the plaintiff's lawsuit against the Defendants in the same object has occurred in the Rokan Hilir District Court with Decision Number 34/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Rhl to the Cassation level at the Supreme Court, so that in accordance with the MARI decision Number: 4348 K/Pdt/2022 dated December 13, 2022, the case has been decided and has permanent legal force. This is in accordance with the provisions of Article 1917 of the Civil Code, which reads "The power of a Judge's decision that has obtained absolute force is not broader than just regarding the matter of the decision. This means that a case that has been decided by a previous judge and has obtained permanent legal force cannot be sued again with the same subject and object in the future. That the MARI decision Number: 647/K/sip/1973 which states: "The existence or absence of the principle of ne bis in idem is not solely determined by the parties, but especially that the object of the dispute has been given a certain status by a previous Court decision and has permanent legal force". So the judge has the right to reject or not accept the lawsuit from the plaintiff to the plaintiff for a lawsuit whose subject and object are the same

References

I Made Pasek Diantha, 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup)

Irvan Tri Harnanda ( dalam Zeithml., dkk 2018 ). (2021). Peran Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Dalam Pengendalian Kebakaran Hutan Di Provinsi Riau (Studi Kabupaten Rokan Hilir). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 2013–2015.

Johar, O. A., Daeng, M. Y., & Tri, N. M. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencemaran Dan Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Pembakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Hukum Respublica Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lancang Kuning, 21(2), 134–154.

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata

Muhammad YaminLubis, et al, 2019, Hukum Agraria Lanjutan, USU Press, Medan

Nomor, P., Sus, P. I. D., Jkt, P. N., Group, A., Number, I. D., Sus, P., & Jkt, P. (2024). Jurnal reformasi hukum trisakti. 6(1129), 597–608.

Nurmalasari, F., L, S. F. F., & Yusuf, M. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Illegal Mining Terhadap Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup Di Kabupaten Konawe Utara. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i1.3265

Silalahi, D. F. (2021). Implementasi Penetapan Hutan Adat Di Provinsi Riau Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/Puu-X/2012 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kehutanan. Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Riau.

Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Urip Santosa, 2010, Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta