Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Teachers’ Perspective

Mariam Nebieridze; Nino Jojua

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i1.1585

Authors

Mariam Nebieridze Tbilisi State University
Nino Jojua Faculty of Law, Humanities and Social Sciences, European University, Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i1.1585

Keywords:

AI in Georgian higher education, ChatGPT, academic dishonesty, EFL instruction.

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an innovative tool for reshaping educational practices, with ChatGPT emerging as one of the most influential technologies. This technological online instrument, created by OpenAI, offers continuous and interactive learning support, fostering personalized education outside traditional classroom settings. Its integration into educational practices has been met with both enthusiasm and concern, especially regarding issues like AI-assisted academic dishonesty and plagiarism. While an increasing number of existing research has highlighted students' experiences with generative chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, a notable gap remains in understanding the perceptions and needs of language instructors. This study aims to address this gap by investigating EFL (English as a Foreign Language) instructors' perspectives on the use of ChatGPT in educational settings. Specifically, it examines instructors’ familiarity with the tool, their views on its role in academic integrity, and the challenges they face related to AI-assisted cheating in assignments and exams as well as instructors' experiences and strategies for detecting AI-generated content. By addressing these focal points, the study contributes to the broader conversation on digitalization within Georgian higher education, providing insights on how instructors perceive AI’s role, its implications for academic practices, and the integration of digital literacy policies. Additionally, it offers practical recommendations for educators and administrators on how to manage the emerging challenges of AI-assisted education while fostering an ethical and effective learning environment

References

Appleby, C. (2023). Will colleges ban ChatGPT? BestColleges. Retrieved February 2, 2025 from: https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/will-colleges-ban-chatgpt/

Cotton, P.A., Cotton D. R. E. & Shipway J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuringacademic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14703297.2023.219014

Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive generative pre-trained transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 2. 17–23. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00195

Denkin, R. (2004). On perception on prevalence of Cheating and Usage of Generative AI. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/html/2405.18889v1

Fleckenstein J., Meyer J., Jansen T., Keller S.D., Köller O. & Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209.

Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503

Kok, J. N., Boers, E. J., Kosters, W. A., Van der Putten, P., & Poel, M. (2002). Artificial intelligence: definition, trends, techniques, and cases. In UNESCO (Ed.), Knowledge for sustainable development: an insight into the encyclopedia of life support systems (pp. 1095-1107). EOLS

Luckin, R, Holmes, W. Griffiths, M. and Forcier, L. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: AnArgument for AI in education. Pearson Education, London, UK retrieved February 22 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299561597

Merkviladze, M. (2024). Integration of Automated Feedback Tools in EFL AcademicWriting Classes: Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v10i1.323

Nebieridze, M., & Jojua, N. (2024). Why do students use ChatGPT and why does it matter? Reflecting on the Use of AI in Higher Education. Online Journal of Humanities. ETAGTSU, (9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.52340/PUTK.2024.2346-8149.09.12

Nebieridze, M., & Jojua, N. (2024). Towards the use of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in higher education: Students’ Perspective. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 9 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v9i2.313

Pipia, E., Gurgenishvili, T. 2024). The impact of ChatGPT on English language students’ writing skills. 14th International Research Conference on Education, Language and Literature. ISSN: 2298 0180

Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. En Springer eBooks (pp. 5243-5245). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337

Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods, No 46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.