From Public Opinion to Digital Resistance: The Role of Social Media in Contesting Government Policies

I Gusti Ngurah Parthama; I Wayan Pastika; I Made Netra; I Nyoman Aryawibawa

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1617

Authors

I Gusti Ngurah Parthama Udayana University
I Wayan Pastika Udayana University
I Made Netra Udayana University
I Nyoman Aryawibawa Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1617

Keywords:

social media, digital discourse, political communication, democratization, user engagement

Abstract

The rise of social media has significantly transformed public discourse. It allows individuals to engage in political discussions, express opinions, and challenge governmental narratives. Unlike traditional media, social media platforms facilitate interactive and participatory engagement. Users can respond to official statements in real time. This study examines user comments on Kompas Facebook post regarding the Indonesian government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Analyzing the discourse within these comments, the research explores functions of social media as a platform for democratization, power resistance, two-way communication, and alternative discourse formation. This study employs qualitative content analysis and critical discourse analysis (CDA). It is used to categorize and interpret user comments. The data included diverse linguistic strategies such as support, criticism, sarcasm, rhetorical questions, and religious expressions. Those were systematically coded to identify emerging themes. The findings reveal that social media enables democratic participation. It is also characterized by polarization of discourse and performative engagement. The interaction between government narratives and user responses demonstrates that social media facilitates counter public discourse, ideological contestation, and user-driven political deliberation. The study concludes social media that serves as a dynamic space for political communication where institutional narratives are actively contested. However, the limited presence of constructive suggestions highlights the challenges of fostering substantive policy discussions in digital spaces. By bridging discourse analysis, media studies, and political communication, this research provides a novel contribution to understanding digital discourse dynamics in contemporary political engagement.

References

Adolphs, S., & Knight, D. (2020). The Routledge Handbook of English language and digital humanities. The Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities, 1–605. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758

Baron, N. S. (2008). Always On Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press.

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language Online. Language Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552308

Bouvier, G. (2015). What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: connecting with other academic fields? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830901

Dordevic, J. P. (2022). Digital media discourse in linguistic research. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia. https://doi.org/10.46630/dmd.2022

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse (Vol. 6). Arnold Publisher.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.5354/0716-3991.2013.29147

Fairclough, N. (2016). Discourse and Social Change. Blackwell PUblishing.

Kohout, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Bakker, B. N. (2023). May I have your Attention, please? An eye tracking study on emotional social media comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 139(April 2021), 107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107495

Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016

Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

Lee, M. J., & Chun, J. W. (2016). Reading others’ comments and public opinion poll results on social media: Social judgment and spiral of empowerment. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.007

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 3). SAGE Publications. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Schindler, M., & Domahidi, E. (2021). The growing field of interdisciplinary research on user comments: A computational scoping review. New Media and Society, 23(8), 2474–2492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821994491

Shahbaznezhad, H., Dolan, R., & Rashidirad, M. (2021). The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users’ Engagement Behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.05.001

Thurlow, C. (2017). Digital discourse : Locating language in new / social media.

Vendemia, M. A., Bond, R. M., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2019). The strategic presentation of user comments affects how political messages are evaluated on social media sites: Evidence for robust effects across party lines. Computers in Human Behavior, 91(October 2018), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.007