Application of the Law to Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Abortion and Owners of Illegal Abortion Practices (Study Decision Number 286/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Jkt.Tim)

Authors

  • Muhammad Fadlan Faculty of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
  • Risdalina Risdalina Faculty of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
  • Maya Jannah Faculty of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1630

Keywords:

Implementation of Law, Perpetrators, Criminal Acts, Abortion, Abortion Practice Owners, Illegal.

Abstract

This research uses normative legal research methods to examine the application of criminal sanctions against abortion perpetrators and owners of illegal abortion practices based on Decision Number 286/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Tim. In this decision, the judge sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for 2 years and 6 months and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000.00, with the provision that if it was not paid, it would be replaced by imprisonment for 3 months. This decision was deemed appropriate because the defendant was legally and convincingly proven to have practiced illegal abortion together, violating Article 75 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 194 of Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health and Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code. The aggravating circumstance is that the defendant's actions are contrary to human values ​​and endanger the safety of other people. Meanwhile, mitigating circumstances are that the defendant behaved politely at trial, had never been convicted, and admitted his actions honestly and regretted them. The driving factor for the abortion was pressure from the work contract which caused witness R and witness NAS to be forced to have an abortion because they were worried about losing their jobs. Apart from that, illegal abortion practices are carried out for economic gain, where patients have to pay around IDR 8.5 million to have an abortion. This reflects weak supervision of illegal health practices and low awareness of the health dangers they cause

References

Adolph, R. (2016). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 1–23.

Island, F., Islands, G., Fuke, Y., Iwasaki, T., Sasazuka, M., & Yamamoto, Y. (2021). 福家悠介 1 ・岩﨑朝生 2 ・笹塚 諒 3 ・山本佑治 4. 71(1), 63–71.

Jaka Prima. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 3(01), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v3i01.702

Latar, P. A., Masalah, B., Provocatus, A., Provocatus, A., Therapeuticus, A. P., Criminalis, A. P., Therapeuticus, A. P., Provocatus, A., Abortus, S., Criminalis, P., Provokatus, A., Provocatus, A., & Criminalis, A. P. (2006). Dadang Hawari. 2006. Aborsi Dimensi Psikoreligi . Balai Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia : Jakarta. Halaman 60. 1. 1–14.

Lesmono, J. H., & Fitriati. (2024). Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Aborsi Oleh Penyidik Berdasarkan Alat Bukti Yang Digunakan. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.495

Luftia Gunawan, Dian Ekawaty Ismail, & Suwitno Yutye Imran. (2023). Pendekatan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Oleh Pelaku Dibawah Umur. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 01–25. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i1.3155

Manohara, I. B. M. P. (2018). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Berlaku (Kitab Hukum Pidana dan Undang-Undang Nomor. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan). Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 3(1), 2–14. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/276852-penerapan-sanksi-pidana-bagi-pelaku-tind-1ca3b92a.pdf

Maridjan, G. N. (2019). Aborsi Dalam Penerapan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 8(6), 114–121.

Pranata, B. A. A., Sujana, I. N., & Sudibya, D. G. (2020). Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Aborsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 87/Pid.G/2007/Pn.Gir). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.2.1891.148-154

SHELEMO, A. A. (2023). No Titleیلیب. Nucl. Phys., 13(1), 104–116.

Suputra, I. B. M. A., & Parwata, I. G. N. (2021). Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Kuhp Dan Uu Kesehatan. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 10(36).

Susanti, Y. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi. Abortus Provocatus, 2(4).

Downloads

Published

2025-04-16

How to Cite

Muhammad Fadlan, Risdalina Risdalina, & Maya Jannah. (2025). Application of the Law to Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Abortion and Owners of Illegal Abortion Practices (Study Decision Number 286/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Jkt.Tim). International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1630

Issue

Section

Social Science