Juridical Study Determining the Implementation of the Corruption Eradication Article Based on Sema Number 7 of 2012

Firman  Harefa; Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Wahyu Simon Tampubolon

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1631

Authors

Firman Harefa Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
Muhammad Yusuf Siregar Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University
Wahyu Simon Tampubolon Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1631

Keywords:

SP3 (Order to Stop Investigation), Traffic Accidents, Victims;

Abstract

This research uses a normative legal research method which discusses changes in the provisions on the value of state financial losses in cases of criminal acts of corruption based on the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA). SEMA Number 7 of 2012 states that state financial losses are above Rp. 100,000,000.00 can be subject to Article 2 paragraph (1) UUPTPK, while losses below that figure are subject to Article 3 UUPTPK. However, due to changes in currency values, SEMA Number 3 of 2018 changed the loss limit to IDR. 200,000,000.00. If the value of state losses is above Rp. 200,000,000.00, then Article 2 paragraph (1) UUPTPK applies, while losses are below or up to Rp. 200,000,000.00 applies to Article 3 UUPTPK. This change aims to provide legal certainty and make it easier for law enforcement officials to determine the articles that are suspected of committing criminal acts of corruption. Apart from that, this revision is an effort by the Supreme Court to eliminate the alleged practice of buying and selling articles in handling corruption cases. According to researchers, if there are no provisions for this change, the application of law in Indonesia will be ineffective because law functions to create order, justice and legal certainty in state life.

References

Arsil., Astriyani., Rositawati, D., Aziezi, M. T., Cohen, D. (David J. ., East-West Center., & Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Untuk Independensi Peradilan (Jakarta, I. (2021). Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Pasca-2009.

Asiva Noor Rachmayani. (2015). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title.

Edyyono, S. W., Napitupulu, E., Panjaitan, S., Anggara, Suryadarma, A., & Yulianto, T. (2017). Memperkuat Revisi Undang-Undang Narkotika Indonesia: Usulan Masyarakat Sipil. 1–103. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Memperkuat-Revisi-UU-Narkotika.pdf

Indra, P., Panjaitan, H., & Hutahaean, A. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berupa Perampasan Aset Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (Online), 4(3), 994. https://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/JCM/article/view/1715

JASMINE, K. (2014). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Penambahan Natrium Benzoat Dan Kalium Sorbat (Antiinversi) Dan Kecepatan Pengadukan Sebagai Upaya Penghambatan Reaksi Inversi Pada Nira Tebu.

Mappatunru, A. M. D. (2021). Unsur Memperkaya Dan Menguntungkan Diri Sendiri, Orang Lain Atau Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Media Hukum Vol., 9(2), 59–69.

Murdiawati, D., & Parman, L. (2020). Penerapan Ketentuan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Sema Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. Jurnal Education and …, 23(1), 98–107. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2333%0Ahttps://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/download/2333/1236

Nining, N., Sabri, F., & Elvandari, S. (2023). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Tidak Memiliki Keahlian dan Kewenangan Melakukan Praktik Kefarmasian Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(3), 976–994. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i3.401

Pokhrel, S. (2024). No TitleΕΛΕΝΗ. In Αγαη (Vol. 15, Issue 1).

Pusat Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Nasional BPHN. (2023). Analisis Dan Evaluasi Hukum Mengenai Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 1–277. https://bphn.go.id/

Ricky Gunawan, Miko Ginting, Raynov T. Pamintori, M. R. (2021). Perbaikan Tata Kelola Narkotika Indonesia: Mencari Alternatif Non Pemidanaan Bagi Penggunaan Narkotika.

Ulfah, M. (2022). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Terkait Pencabutan Pengetatan Remisi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi ( Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor Perkara : 28 P / Hum / 2021 ).”. In Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Prof.K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto. https://eprints.uinsaizu.ac.id/15681/1/Maria ulfah_implikasi putusan mahkamah agung terkait pencabutan pengetatan remisi bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi.pdf