Legal Implications of Land Ownership Rights of Dago Elos Residents Following the Decision No. 601/Pid.B/2024/PN Bdg

Muhammad Syeisar Nanda Prawira; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih; Herlindah Herlindah

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1650

Authors

Muhammad Syeisar Nanda Prawira Brawijaya University
Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Herlindah Herlindah Brawijaya University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1650

Keywords:

Judicial review, land dispute, Dago Elos, forged inheritance documents, legal certainty

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of land ownership rights in Dago Elos following Bandung District Court Decision No. 601/Pid.B/2024/PN Bdg, which annulled the inheritance claim by the Muller Family over land formerly titled as Eigendom Verponding Nos. 3740, 3741, and 3742. Previously, the Supreme Court Decision No. 109 PK/Pdt/2022 had ruled in favor of the Muller Family and ordered Dago Elos residents to vacate the land they had occupied for decades. However, in 2024, new legal evidence (novum) emerged proving the Muller Family committed inheritance fraud, as confirmed by a criminal verdict. This research adopts a normative juridical method with a case and statutory approach. The findings reveal that falsified heirship documents invalidate the Muller Family’s legal standing over the disputed land. Under Supreme Court Circular No. 10 of 2009, the affected residents have the right to submit a second judicial review to restore their land rights. This study highlights the importance of substantive justice in agrarian disputes and the necessity of legal protection for communities with long-standing physical control over their land.

References

Asnanda, A., Rahmatiar, Y., Abas, M., Sanjaya, S., 2024. Legal Effects On Control Of Rights To Land Of The Former Eigendom Verponding State In Disputes Between Heirs The Muller Family With Citizens Of Dago Elos Bandung. Awang Long Law Rev. 6, 521–526.

Fakhiryah, V.N., 2020. Tindak Pidana Memasukkan Keterangan Palsu Ke Dalam Akta Otentik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 602 K/PID/2016). J. Huk. Media Justitia Nusant. 10.

Ginting, S., Lidjon, W., 2020. Analisis Kasus Sengketa Tanah Di Dago Elos Akibat Hukum Eigendom Verponding (Studi Putusan Nomor 570/PDT/2017/PT BDG). J. Law Justitia VI No 1.

Hernoko, A.Y., Anand, G., Roro, F.S., Bambang, S.A.S., 2016. Dasar Pengajuan Upaya Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Perdata. Zifatama Publishing, Sidoarjo.

Khoirunnisa, I., Putri, B.S., Nikmah, N.L., 2024. Hak Prioritas Terhadap Perolehan Tanah Negara Bekas Hak. UNES Law Rev. 6.

Lamintang, P.A.F., C.D, S., 1984. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Lamintang, P.A.F., Lamintang, F.T., 2014. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

LBH Bandung (28 Februari 2018): Press Release: Pernyataan Sikap Warga Dago Elos dan Tamansari., 2018.

Maharani, F.D., Anggoro, T., 2024. Keberlakuan Eigendom Verponding Pada Tanah Negara Yang Penguasaan Fisiknya Dikuasai Oleh Penggarap (Studi Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 109 PK/PDT/2022). Indones. Notary.

Muaja, H., Rompas, D., 2021. Kajian Yuridis Pemalsuan Surat Sederhana (Pasal 263 KUHP) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik (Pasal 264 Ayat (1) Ke-1 KUHP). Lex Crimen Vol.X/No.1.

Noor, A., Herlani, L., Fathurrohman, M.F., Lorenza, M., Nurwidianti, M., 2024. The Connected Of The SupremeCourt Decision Number 109/PK/PDT/2022 With The Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 OF 1960 Concerning Eigendom Verponding. J. Ilmu Huk. Vol 8 No.2.

Putri, T.D.A., Susilowati, I.F., 2023. Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 109 PK/Pdt/2022 Terkait Penguasaan Tanah Bekas Eigendom Verponding.

Putusan Nomor 601/Pid.B/2024/PN Bdg, 2024.

Setiawati, N.A., 2011. Dari Tanah Sultan Menuju Tanah Rakyat. STPN Press, Yogyakarta.

Soekanto, S., Mamudji, S., 2014. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, cet. 16. ed. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Soesilo, R., 1991. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Politeia, Bogor.

Suteki, Taufani, G., 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik). Rajawali Pers, Depok.

Syukur, A.N., Nuraini, H., Yusmiati, Y., 2022. Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Kasus Warga Dago Elos Melawan Keluarga Muller: Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Nomor 109 PK/PDT/2022. J. Poros Huk. Padjadjaran 4, 51–72.