Analysis Of The Legal Position Of Cctv As Evidence In Criminal Cases (STUDY OF Decision Number 8/PID.SUS-ANAK/2021/PT-PDG)

Ridwan Ridwan; Kusno Kusno; Ahmad Ansyari Siregar

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1666

Authors

Ridwan Ridwan Faculty of Law, Labuhan Batu University
Kusno Kusno Faculty of Law, Labuhan Batu University
Ahmad Ansyari Siregar Faculty of Law, Labuhan Batu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1666

Keywords:

Legal Status, CCTV, Evidence, Criminal Case;

Abstract

This study is intended to find out and understand the legal position of CCTV as evidence in criminal cases (Decision Study). Number 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PT-Pdg). This study uses a normative legal research method. Normative legal research is examining law from an internal perspective with the object of research being legal norms. Discussion results: CCTV has the same position as other evidence regulated and stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. Because its position is the same as other evidence, CCTV is considered to have the same legal force as SUCH evidence. Although not explicitly stated in the Criminal Procedure Code, CCTV can be used as additional or evidence as further evidence in a criminal case. However, there are provisions that require that there must be a relationship between one piece of evidence and another

References

Adzkari, F., Rahmat, D., & Student, L. F. (2024). KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI CCTV ( CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION ) DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA UMUM BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO . 20 PUU- Faculty Of Law , Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University elektronik , maka alat bukti elektronik lazim digunakan dalam berbagai konteks hukum . 3. 2(3), 14–31.

ANANDA MUHAMAD TRI UTAMA. (2022). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. 9(2), 356–363.

AS, Y., Purba, C. S., & Lipi, L. (2020). Kedudukan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 1(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v1i2.13

Badri, A. (2021). Jurnal Analisis Hukum Jurnal Analisis Hukum. Efektivitas Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Ainul, 2(2), 1–6.

BINTARI, A. Y. (2022). "Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. 316.

CINTIA AGUSTINA RESVIANDA. (2016). ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG ATAU CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SEBAGAI DASAR HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PIDANA PERSPEKTIF FIQH JINA>YAH (Studi Putusan Nomor: 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.JKT.PST.) SKRIPSI. 1–23.

Dw Agung Md Krisna Pranata, Simon Nahak, & Made Minggu Widyantara. (2019). Peranan Closed Circuit Television (Cctv) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.1.2.1749.163-168

Ismail, I., & Maysarah, A. (2024). Eksistensi Cctv Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Umum. Warta Dharmawangsa, 18(3), 1100–1121. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v18i3.4774

Pasal, K. (2021). Alat Bukti Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Alat Bukti Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Kuhap Pasal 184.

Rika Widianita, D. (2023). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. In AT-TAWASSUTH: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam: Vol. VIII (Issue I).

Valini, R. (2019). Analisis Eksistensi Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Pada Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum. Cepalo, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v1no1.1751

Yanuarita, I., & Megawati, W. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum Alat Bukti Petunjuk Rekaman Cctv Oleh Hakim Dalam Menjatuhi Hukuman Pidana (Studi Kasus Putusan NO. 141/PID. B/2018/PN SLW/Pengadilan Negri Slawi). UNES Law Review, 6(1), 1094–1113. https://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/906/660