State Finland Education System and Finland Education Best Pratice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.188Keywords:
Finland, Educational System, Best PracticeAbstract
In the study of theory and literacy described, it can be seen about the education system in Finland, namely the following reasons: 1. The education system in Finland is flexible, making it easier for all components of education to develop teaching methods and techniques. And encourage students to be more flexible in understanding knowledge. 2. Comprehensive education for all. Financial education assistance by the government and free of charge in learning to answer the problems of people who need education as a way to improve their standard of living. 3. Inclusion-based education. Students with special needs continue to receive the same education and the same assistance from the government as well as the components of education. 4. A job as an educator who is highly valued and has a good selection makes teaching performance considered good. 5. Famous for the results of research conducted by many students and other components, making knowledge always developing.
References
Amin, M., Arsil, Fathurrochman, I., Bahri, S., Rahmaningsih S. (2019). Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan Pada Perguruan Tinggi. Curup; LP2 IAIN Curup.
Anggoro, S. 2017. “Keberhasilan Pendidikan Finlandia.” 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321696140_Keberhasilan_Pen didikan_Finlandia.
Blazar, D, and M Kraft. 2017. “Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 39 (1): 146–70. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3102/0162373716670260.
Charron, Nicholas, D Ph, T. Givens, A Luedtke, Javier Arregui, Mathew Creighton, Mari Murtonen, et al. 2013. “Human Development Report 2015 Work for Human Development.” Public Health 27 (6): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815583253.
Fathurrochman, Irwan. “Integrasi Media Sosial Pada Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Filsafat Pendidikan Islam.” Journal of Education and Instruction 1, no. 1 (2018): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Finland, Ministry of Education. 2015. “Ministry of Education 2015.” UNESCO. 2015. http://uil.unesco.org/i/doc/lifelong-learning/policies/finland1ministry-of-educationstrategy- 2015.pdf. Finnish National Agency For Education. 2018. “Education System: Equal Opportunities to High Quality Education.” 2018. https://www.oph.fi/english/education_system.
Gagnidze, A, and S Maglakelidze. 2017. “Competition on the Georgia Education Marketplace.” International Education Studies 10 (6): 10–22. Goodill, C.A. 2017. “An Analysis of the Educational System In Finland and the United States: A Case Study.”2017.https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&con te xt=uhp_theses.
Kasihadi, R.B. 2016. “Optimalisasi Prestasi Peserta Didik Melalui Sistem Pendidikan Yang Humanis: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Negara Maju.” Jurnal Widyatama 20 (2): 145–51.
Lauen, D, L, and S.M Gaddis. 2016. “Accountability Pressure, Academic Standards, and Educational Triage.” Educatinal Evaluation and Policy Analysis 38 (1): 127–47. Liputan6.Com. 2014. “Pendidikan Di Finlandia Maju Berkat Ki Hajar Dewantara.” 2014. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/2141165/pendidikan-di-finlandia1majuberkat-ki-hadjar- dewantara.
Notoatmojo, Soekidjo. 2011. “Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.” Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum 2 (1): 124
Nuzuar, Fathurrochman, I., Amin, M., et al. (2017). Manajemen dan Metodologi Pendidikan Agama Islam. Curup; LP2 IAIN Curup OECD. 2015. “Country Note Results of PISA 2015: Indonesia.” 2015. Parker, Lyn, and R Raihani. 2011. “Democratizing Indonesia through Education ? Community Participation in Islamic Schooling.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (6): 712– 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211416389.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No. 14 Tahun 2018 Tentang PPDB Pada TK, SD, SMP, SMA, SMK, Atau Bentuk Lain Yang Sederajat. 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No.16 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi 33 Akademik Dan Kompetensi Guru. 2007. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. Pfeffer, Fabian T. 2015. “Equality and Quality in Education a Comparative Study of 19 Countries.” Social Science Research 51 (1): 350–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.09.004. Putra, K.P. 2015. “Resistansi
Finlandia Terhadap Global Educational Reform.” Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional 4 (1): 1393– 1421. Reynolds, David, Brian J. Caldwell, Rosa Maria Cruz, Zhenzhen
Miao, Javier Murillo, Hamis Mugendawala, Begoña De La Iglesia Mayol, Carme Pinya Medina, and Maria Rosa Rosselló Ramon. 2015. “Comparative Educational Research.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement: Research, Policy, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679488.
Ristianti, D. H., Danim, S., Winarto, H., & Dharmayana, I. W. (2019). The Development Of Group Counselling Assessment Instruments. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 267–272.
Retrieved from http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR11019-23814 Sahlberg, P. 2009. “Education Reform For Rising Economic Competitiveness.” International Organizations Research Journal 4 (1): 15–33.
Sahlberg, Pasi. 2011. “Paradoxes of Educational Improvement: The Finnish Experience.” Scottish Educational Review 43 (1): 3–23. Sarica, Gulcin Nagehan, and Nadire Cavus. 2009. “New Trends in 21st Century English Learning.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1 (1): 439–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.079.
Ulfatin, N. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Di Bidang Pendidikan: Teori Dan Aplikasinya. Malang: Media Nusa Creative. Uotila, T, V Harmaakorpi, and R Hermans. 2013. “Finnish Mosaic of Regional Innovation System Assesment of Thematical Regional Inovation Platforms Based on Related Variety.” European Planning Studies 20 (10)
