Great Power Competition: Ideological Struggles and Their Impact on Global Stability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i2.1928Keywords:
Great Power Competition, Ideological Rivalry, Foreign Policy, International Relations, U.S.-China RivalryAbstract
This study examines contemporary great power competition (GPC) as a multidimensional contest driven, importantly, by ideological struggles. This study portrays that global strategic behavior and major power rivalry arenas are guided by ideological influences rather than customary material forces in realism paradigm through analyzing how U.S. Liberal Internationalism and Chinese Embedded Authoritarianism function as key drivers in global systemic economic competition and political governance tech wars. The research conducts a qualitative method with descriptive analysis approach to garner a better understanding of GPC complex phenomenon which then to answer the research questions. The findings indicate that contemporary GPC in ideology, particularly between the “U.S. liberal democracy and China’s embedded authoritarianism,” is a distinct multiplex concept rather than a Cold War extension version. This ideology influence strategic behavior and foreign policy decision-making of the U.S. and China in their international politics. This research identify that, in recent development, their competition unfold in three domains: economy, technology, and the global governance. In conclusion, this ideological competition profoundly impacts global stability by eroding the authority of international institutions and increasing the risk of armed conflict. Therefore a comprehending global politics in the future requires an integrated theoretical framework where the ideological realm becomes the focal point of analysis, which can be applied in navigating a bipolar reality.
References
Bashirov, G., Akbarzadeh, S., Yilmaz, I., & Ahmed, Z. S. (2025). Diffusion of digital authoritarian practices in China’s neighbourhood: the cases of Iran and Pakistan. Democratization, 1–24.
Bode, I., Ducci, C., & Lee, P. K. (2025). Introduction to the Special Section on Making Sense of the US–China “Tech War.” Global Studies Quarterly, 5(2).
Bradford, A. (2023). Exporting China’s Digital Authoritarianism through Infrastructure. In Digital Empires (pp. 290–323). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brands, H. (2017). Six Propositions about Great- Power Competition and Revisionism in the 21st Century. The Future of the Global Order Colloquium- Fall 2017, 1–4.
Brands, H. (2018). Democracy vs Authoritarianism: How Ideology Shapes Great-Power Conflict. Survival, 60(5), 61–114.
Budiana, M. (2024). The Role of Ideology in Forming International Political Alliances. Journal of Student Collaboration Research, 1(3), 120–134.
Chen, Y.-C., & Abalos, K. (2024). Taiwan’s Diplomatic Allies and the Struggle for Global Inclusion. https://www.isdp.eu/publication/taiwans-diplomatic-allies-and-the-struggle-for-global-inclusion/. Accessed June 26, 2025
Cruz, M. A., Brabazon, J. J., Halfhill, D. S., & Ritzel, S. M. (2020, February 3). Between Theory and Practice: The Utility of International Relations Theory to the Military Practitioner. Air University. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Wild-Blue-Yonder/Articles/Article-Display/Article/2063140/between-theory-and-practice-the-utility-of-international-relations-theory-to-th/. Accessed June 26, 2025
Davydov, A. (2022). A Model for Analysis of Ideology in Foreign Policy. World Economy and International Relations, 66(8), 93–100.
De Conti, B., Pereira, M. S., & Prates, D. M. (2019). Belt and Road Initiative: a Chinese Marshall plan? Papel Político, 4(2).
Deudney, D., & John Ikenberry, G. (2021). Getting Restraint Right: Liberal Internationalism and American Foreign Policy. Survival, 63(6), 63–100.
DiCicco, J. M., & Onea, T. A. (2023). Great-Power Competition. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dieste Muñoz, S. (2025). Great power competition and its impact on international politics. IEEE Opinion Paper 25/2025.
Friedberg, A. L. (2014). The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Explaining Beijing’s Assertiveness. The Washington Quarterly, 37(4), 133–150.
Gaens, B., & Sinkkonen, V. (2020). Great-Power Competition and the Rising US-China Rivalry – Towards a New Normal? (FIIA Report; No. 66). Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
Goodman, A. (2023). The Conceptual “New Cold War”: A Comparative Analysis of Great Power Competition [Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses/558. Accessed September 21, 2025.
Gries, P. (2022). Beyond Power Politics: How Ideology Motivates Threat Perception—and International Relations. International Studies, 59(4), 289–314.
Jie, D. (2020). The emerging ideological security dilemma between China and the U.S. China International Strategy Review, 2(2), 184–196.
Krebs, R. R., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66.
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229.
Lynch III, T. F., & Saunders, P. C. (2020). Contemporary Great Power Geostrategic Dynamics Relations and Strategies. In T. F. Lynch III (Ed.), Strategic Assessment 2020: Into a New Era of Great Power Competition. Washington: NDU Press.
Mankoff, J. (2020). The United States in a World of Great Power Competition. Journal of International Analytics, 11(3), 78–94.
Müller, T. (2024). Narratives, Knowledge Objects, and the Making of Great Power Competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(3).
Owen, J. M. (2025). Why Great Powers Compete to Control International Institutions. International Security, 49(3), 84–121.
Patel, S. (2025). China’s Belt and Road Initiative Is Reshaping Global Power Infrastructure. https://www.powermag.com/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-is-reshaping-global-power-infrastructure/. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Peng, Y. (2025). Can U.S. Sanctions Truly Hinder the Rise of China’s Semiconductor Industry? An Analysis from the Perspective of “Creative Insecurity.” Chinese Political Science Review.
Popescu, I. (2025). Great power competition, offensive realism, and the new debates on US grand strategy. Comparative Strategy, 44(1), 92–114.
Putri, F. I., Pedrason, R., Inkiriwang, F. F. W., Andriyanto, K. E., & Arum, D. S. (2024). Post-Cold War Great Power Strategic Engagements: United States-China-Russia. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 3(12), 4581–4600.
Roberts, T. (2023). Safety and regulating risks: who is safe in ‘safe cities’? Institute of Development Study. https://www.ids.ac.uk/opinions/safety-and-regulating-risks-who-is-safe-in-safe-cities/. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Schmidt, B. C., & Wight, C. (2023). Rationalism and the “rational actor assumption” in realist international relations theory. Journal of International Political Theory, 19(2), 158–182.
Schobell, A. (2025). The Perils of a Cold War Analogy for Today’s U.S.-China Rivalry. The United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/publications/2025/06/perils-cold-war-analogy-todays-us-china-rivalry. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Shrivastava, M., & Jash, A. (2025). China’s semiconductor conundrum: understanding US export controls and their efficacy. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1).
Taylor, M., & Garlick, J. (2025). ‘Flexible’ versus ‘fragmented’ authoritarianism: evidence from Chinese foreign policy during the Xi Jinping era. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 79(2), 189–208.
Viña, M. L., & Schaefer, B. D. (2023). Personnel Is Power: Why China Is Winning At The United Nations. Jewish Institute for National Security of America. https://jinsa.org/personnel-is-power-why-china-is-winning-at-the-united-nations/. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Winkler, S. C. (2025). New and Old Cold Wars: The Tech War and the Role of Technology in Great Power Politics. Global Studies Quarterly, 5(2).
Wu, X. (2020). Technology, power, and uncontrolled great power strategic competition between China and the United States. China International Strategy Review, 2(1), 99–119.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ari Harmoko, Rodon Pedrason, Sudibyo Sudibyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









































