Legal Consequences Of Authentic Deeds Made Based On Oral Document Verification Without Written Evidence

Khadijah Khadijah; Edi Tarsono; Rr. Utji Sri Wulan Wiryandari

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.1979

Authors

Khadijah Khadijah Universitas Pancasila
Edi Tarsono Universitas Pancasila
Rr. Utji Sri Wulan Wiryandari Universitas Pancasila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.1979

Keywords:

Law Consequences, Authentic Deed, Notarial

Abstract

Against agreements including name loan agreements are generally set forth in an authentic Acte in order to have strong evidentiary power. An authentic Acte is a document made in accordance with the provisions of the form regulated by laws and regulations and drawn up by or in the presence of a Civil Servant authorized at the location of the Acte. The position of Notary is regulated in precisely in Clause 1 Number 1 UUJN. The provision states that a notary is a Civil Servant who has authority in making authentic Actes as well as other authorities as stipulated in this law. In his capacity as a Civil Servant, the notary provides explanations or testimonies regarding everything seen, witnessed and experienced by him that is done by other parties. This research is descriptive-analytical in nature, comprehensively, systematically, and thoroughly describing the legal consequences of authentic deeds made based on verbal document verification without supporting written evidence, particularly in relation to the notary's liability to third parties who suffer losses. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is research based on legal norms contained in legislation, legal doctrines, and related jurisprudence. An authentic Acte made only on the basis of oral verification of documents without being supported by written evidence carries serious legal consequences, namely the loss of authenticity and legal force of the Acte. This causes the Acte to be declared null and void or at least legally defective, contrary to the provisions Clause 1868 Civil Code, which requires written documents as a basis for making authentic Actes. As a result, the notary who made the Acte must be legally responsible for losses suffered by third parties, including criminal, administrative, civil, and ethical liability, which confirms that the notary's liability is multidimensional in order to maintain the integrity of his profession.

References

Dini Anggraeni and Siti Mahmudah, “Urgensi Peningkatan Peran Notaris Melalui Implementasi Konsep Cyber Notary Dalam Pembuatan Akta Di Era Cyber Society 5.0,” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (2023): 2307–20

Gaby Handayani Simangunsong and Janpatar Simamora, “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris Pengganti Dalam Pembuatan Akta Melampaui Kewenangan Di Indonesia,” Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam 11, no. 2 (2024)

Hendra, Rahmad. Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Ida Ayu Kade Kusumaningrum, I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana, and I Dewa Made Suartha, “Kewajiban Saksi Instrumenter Merahasiakan Isi Akta Berdasarkan UU Jabatan Notaris‟, Acta Comitas, volume 2, 2017.

Inge Kalista Hikmasari, “Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Pencipta Lagu Yang Diumumkan Tanpa Seizin Pencipta,” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 9 (2023).

Kunni Afifah, “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya,” Lex Renaissance 2, no. 1 (2017)

Kurniawan, I Wayan Arya. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta yang Tidak Dibacakan Dihadapan Para Penghadap. Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan.

Mulyata, Jaka. Keadilan, Kepastian, Dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor: 100/PUU-X/2012. Tesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Nur Aini and Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Keterangan Palsu Yang Disampaikan Penghadap Dalam Akta Pendirian Perseroan,” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2019)

Pius Eliadi Hia, Adisti Putrianti Gulo, and Taufika Hidayati, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Batal Demi Hukum (Null And Void) Menurut Ketentuan Pasal 1335 KUH Perdata,” Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan 5, no. 2 (2024): 486–99.

Putra Mekka Mohamad Fajri, Nabilah Ananda Priyanka, “Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Instrumenter Dalam Memberikan Kesaksian di Persidangan atas Suatu Akta Notaris”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Volume 10 Nomor 8, Universitas Indonesia (Fakultas Hukum, 2022)

Putri, Kintania Rizky, dkk. Perjanjian Nominee Jual-Beli Tanah oleh WNA Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No. 137/PDT.G/PN GIN Ditinjau dari Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Global Ilmiah.

Samudera Teguh, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Acara Perdata, Cetakan ke-1, Bandung : Penerbit Alumni, 1992.

Tobing, SH, G.H.S Lusman, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Cetakan ketiga, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1983.

Vicky, Tetti Samosir, and Indah Harlina, “Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Tidak Saksama Dalam Pembuatan Akta Kuasa Menjual (Studi Kasus Putusan No 20pk/Pid/2020),” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 10, no. 2 (2024)