Study of Evidence and Legal Considerations in Unlawful Acts Disputes (Study of West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 36/PUU XXII/2024): (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 36/PUU XXII/2024)

Kurnia Rahmasari; Aghastyar Aghastyar; Radityo Wirananto; M. Almer Fathoni; Syamhaikel Pavel; Pietro Grassio Ekoyulio

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.2002

Authors

Kurnia Rahmasari Universitas Pelita Harapan
Aghastyar Aghastyar Universitas Pelita Harapan
Radityo Wirananto Universitas Pelita Harapan
M. Almer Fathoni Universitas Pelita Harapan
Syamhaikel Pavel Universitas Pelita Harapan
Pietro Grassio Ekoyulio Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.2002

Keywords:

unlawful acts, justice, evidence, constitutional court, court decision

Abstract

Basically, justice requires the court to consider every relevant aspect of the defendant to be taken into consideration before making a decision. This conforms to the requirements in Article 8 paragraph (2) of Law Number 48/2009 concerning Judicial Power which states that "in considering the severity of the crime, the judge must also pay attention to the good and bad character of the defendant". The study employs a normative research methodology or doctrinal legal research with a case approach. The primary source of the research is court decision documents, while secondary sources are as codified statutes and legislation, literature, and any associated scientific journals. Prisons in Indonesia have experienced overcapacity as seen from data from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham) where the number of correctional institution (prison) residents in Indonesia reached 265,897 people as of March 24, 2023. This number has exceeded the aggregate potential of prisons within the nation, totaling 140,424 individuals. So, with such conditions, it can lead to over-punishment for those sentenced to life imprisonment and especially for those sentenced to death who have not yet been executed because they are like undergoing two punishments, namely imprisonment for an indefinite period until they are finally executed and the death penalty itself

References

Arridho, M. R., & Sumarwoto. (2025). TINJAUAN HUKUM PERANAN KETERANGAN SAKSI SEBAGAI AAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PIDANA MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (KUHAP). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(2), 2505–2509.

Darizta, F., Sufitri, S., Firdaus, H., Fathony, M., & Sari, D. I. (2023). BARANG BUKTI DALAM HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DI INDONESIA. Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 91–102.

Dwitarani, D. (2021). Kesesuaian Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyertaan Disertai Kelalaian yang Menyebabkan Kematian dengan Pasal 184 Ayat ( 1 ) KUHAP ( Studi Putusan No. 19/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Trk). Verstek : Jurnal Huku Acara, 10(2), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.20956/verstek.v7i2.xxxx

Hamzani, A. I., Widyastuti, T. V., Khasanah, N., Hazmi, M., & Rusli, M. (2023). Legal Research Method : Theoretical and Implementative Review. 10(2), 3610–3619.

Helmawansyah, M. (2021). PENGGUNAAN BARANG BUKTI ELEKTRONIK YANG DIJADIKAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA. Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 7(2), 524–541.

Hukom, A., Pinasang, R., & Wullur, N. (2021). PENERAPAN ALAT BUKTI PETUNJUK OLEH JAKSA MENURUT PASAL 184 KUHAP DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN MENURUT PASAL 340 KUHP. Lex Administratum, IX(3), 16–26.

Kasidin, S. (2021). KAJIAN HUKUM TENTANG KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI YANG DIPUBLIKASIKAN OLEH SEORANG AHLI DI LUAR PEMERIKSAAN PERSIDANGAN DIHUBUNGKAN PASAL 184 KUHAP. FOCUS : Jurnal of Law, 2(1), 1–20.

Laia, A., & Mustofa, M. (2025). Proving Motive In Premeditated Murder Cases. 3, 732–740.

Motian, Y. N., & Pura, M. H. (2024). Kekuatan Keterangan Ahli Forensik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berdasarkan Pasal 184 Undang -Undang Nomor 08 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang -Undang Hukum Acara Pidana ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 320 K / PID / 2017 ). INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research Volume, 4(4), 9048–9057. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative%0AKekuatan

Nasarudin, A. N., & Arafat, M. R. (2023). Peranan Dan Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Perkosaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(14), 131–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8171562

Runtu, G. M. ., Soekromo, D., & Kasenda, V. D. . (2024). Prosedur Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Perkara Perdata. Lex Administratum, 12(4), 1–12.

Setiawan, I., Rusydi, I., Rahmawati, A., & Hasanah, S. (2022). JEJAK DIGITAL SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI PETUNJUK MENURUT PASAL 184 KITAB UNDANG UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA. Jurnal Ilmuah Galuh Justisi, 10(1), 119–132.