The Philosophy of Defense Science as a Foundation for Developing National Defense Policies in Addressing Asymmetric Warfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.2018Keywords:
Philosophy of Defense Science, National Defense, Asymmetric WarfareAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of the philosophy of science in formulating national Defense policies to address asymmetric warfare threats. These threats, such as cyber warfare and digital propaganda, pose significant challenges to traditional Defense strategies. The research employs a qualitative approach with literature review to gain an in-depth understanding of the application of epistemology, ontology, and axiology in modern Defense strategies. The results indicate that the philosophy of science provides an essential conceptual framework for understanding the multidimensional threats of asymmetric warfare. Epistemology ensures that policies are based on valid knowledge through intelligence gathering and strategic data analysis. Ontology aids in defining new threats, such as cyber and disinformation attacks, while axiology ensures ethical policies by integrating humanitarian values. Moreover, national Defense education focusing on digital literacy and cybersecurity is recommended to enhance societal resilience against non-conventional threats. Technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and big data are also identified as critical tools for efficiently detecting and responding to threats. In conclusion, the philosophy of science not only aids in formulating responsive policies but also promotes a holistic approach involving social, political, and technological dimensions. Its implementation strengthens the legitimacy of national Defense policies and creates sustainable Defense strategies to address the complexities of asymmetric threats. This study recommends integrating the philosophy of science into education, technology development, and international collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of national Defense policies.
References
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy.
Audi, R. (2015). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. University of Michigan Press.
Biddle, S., Friedman, J. A., & Shapiro, J. N. (2012). Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007? International Security, 37(1), 7–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23280403
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Brantly, A. F. (2021). The decision to attack: Military and intelligence cyber decision-making. University of Georgia Press.
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). (2022). Significant Cyber Incidents. https://www.csis.org
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What Is This Thing Called Science? Hackett Publishing.
Clarke, R. A., & Knake, R. K. (2021). Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It. HarperCollins.
Cronin, A. K. (2020). How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton University Press.
Degaut, M. (2020). Do the new forms of warfare require new forms of defense? Comparative Strategy, 3(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2020.1737371
European Commission. (2021). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027.
Gutting, G. (2020). What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, F. G. (2018). Examining complex forms of conflict. PRISM, 7(4), 30–47.
Huntington, S. P. (2020). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Harvard University Press.
Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Kavanagh, J., Marcellino, W., Blake, J. S., Smith, S. G., Davenport, S., & Triezenberg, B. (2020). False information as a weapon: Understanding and countering disinformation. RAND Corporation.
Kilcullen, D. (2009). The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lanoszka, A. (2019). Disinformation in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.6
McKinsey & Company. (2022). The Future of National Security: AI and Data. https://www.mckinsey.com
Metz, S., & Johnson, D. V. (2001). Asymmetry and U.S. Military Strategy: Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts. Strategic Studies Institute.
Nagel, T. (2021). The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE). (2020). Cyber Security Strategy of Estonia. https://ccdcoe.org
Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.
Rawls, J. (2020). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rescher, N. (2012). Philosophical Inquiries: An Introduction to Problems of Philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rid, T. (2012). Cyber war will not take place. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.608939
Rid, T. (2020). Active measures: The secret history of disinformation and political warfare. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press.
Smeets, M. (2021). Cyber deterrence and escalation. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(4), 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1734506
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2021). Human security handbook. UNDP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khansa Mutiara Syah Putri, Suradi Agung Slamet, Rudianto Rudianto , Tasdik Mustika Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
