Pedagogical Support Mechanisms for Learners with Learning Barriers in South Africa: An Analysis Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2274Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Learning Barriers, Teachers’ Support, Pedagogical Support Mechanisms, South AfricaAbstract
Learners who experience barriers to learning continue to face challenges in accessing and fully participating in education, despite inclusive education policies in South Africa. This study aimed to explore how teachers at a primary school support learners with barriers to learning, with particular focus on accommodating learner diversity and promoting equitable access to education. The study was underpinned by an interpretivist paradigm and employed a qualitative research approach with a case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The sample comprised ten participants, including four teachers, four members of the school-Based Support Team (SBST), and two District-Based Support Team (DBST) officials from the Mopani West District, Makhutswe Circuit, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers employed adaptive teaching strategies, curriculum differentiation, and collaborative support structures to address learner diversity. However, persistent challenges such as overcrowded classrooms, limited resources, and insufficient assistive technologies constrained effective implementation. The study concludes that while teachers, SBSTs, and DBSTs play a critical role in advancing inclusive education, systemic and resource-related barriers hinder optimal practice. It is recommended that stakeholder collaboration be strengthened, targeted professional development be enhanced, and inclusive education policies be more effectively implemented to support learners with barriers to learning.
References
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behaviour: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842
Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. (2024). National waste management strategy 2024. Government of South Africa. https://www.dffe.gov.za/documents/strategies
Dias, S. M. (2020). Integrating informal workers into selective waste collection: The case of Brazil. In M. Scheinberg & S. Simpson-Hébert (Eds.), Solid waste management in the world's cities (pp. 156-174). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776059
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2023). Circular economy principles [Report]. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Godfrey, L., & Oelofse, S. (2021). Historical review of waste management and recycling in South Africa. Resources, 10(6), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060057
Godfrey, L., Strydom, W., & Phukubye, R. (2024). Integrating informal reclaimers into municipal waste systems: Lessons from South African cities. Waste Management & Research, 42(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231205678
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2023). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028.
Marino, A., & Pariso, P. (2021). Comparing European strategies for circular economy in small towns. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103226.
Nahman, A., & Godfrey, L. (2021). Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: Opportunities and constraints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 76, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.00
Oelofse, S., & Godfrey, L. (2022). Recycling and resource recovery from municipal solid waste in South Africa. In H. Taherzadeh & T. Richards (Eds.), Resource recovery from wastes (pp. 301-321). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85223-4.00015-8
Piketh, S., Mtshali, M., & Goyns, A. (2021). Household waste management in South African small towns: Attitudes and practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, 111944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111944
Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Lim, S. (2022). Sustaining the environment through recycling: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Management, 102(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114130
Samson, M. (2021). Refusing to be cast aside: Waste pickers organizing around the world. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO). https://www.wiego.org/publications/refusing-be-cast-aside-waste-pickers-organizing-around-world
Schenck, C. J., Grobler, L., Blaauw, P. F., & Viljoen, K. (2022). The management of marine plastic pollution in South Africa: The role of extended producer responsibility. Marine Policy, 144, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105227
Schenck, C. J., Blaauw, P. F., Viljoen, K., & Swart, E. C. (2023). Exploring the potential health risks faced by waste pickers in South Africa: A socio-ecological perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032550
Schröder, P., Lemille, A., & Desmond, P. (2020). Making the circular economy work for human development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686
Seng, B., Kaneko, H., Hirayama, K., & Katayama-Hirayama, K. (2023). Municipal solid waste management in Phnom Penh, capital city of Cambodia. Waste Management & Research, 31(5), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13476746
Simatele, D. M., & Etambakonga, C. L. (2020). Scavenging for solid waste in Kinshasa: A livelihood strategy for the urban poor in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Habitat International, 49, 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.029
Statistics South Africa. (2024). National poverty lines 2024. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P03101/P031012024.pdf
Viljoen, K., Schenck, C. J., & Blaauw, P. F. (2022). The role and linkages of buy-back centres in the recycling industry: Pretoria and Bloemfontein, South Africa. Waste Management & Research, 40(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211003965
Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carpintero, A., Velis, K., Iyer, M., & Simonett, O. (2022). Global waste management outlook (2nd ed.). United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-waste-management-outlook-2022Adelia Rachma, 2021, Mengkaji Aspek Legal Peraturan Pemrtintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 Mekanisme dan Penegakan Pengelolaan Royalti Musik, Jakarta: Kabinet Karsa Ananta
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Mbongiseni Buthelezi, Lethabo Clement Mametja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








































