Digital Transformation of Regional Property Management: e-BMD Implementation and Its Implications for Substantive Accountability

Indra Jaya Sabir; Frida Chairunisa; Andi Rasdiyanti; Muh. Syarif Ahmad; Wahyu Nurdiansyah N

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v6i2.2578

Authors

Indra Jaya Sabir Study Program of State Development Administration, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, Indonesia
Frida Chairunisa Study Program of State Development Administration, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, Indonesia
Andi Rasdiyanti Study Program of State Development Administration, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, Indonesia
Muh. Syarif Ahmad Study Program of State Development Administration, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, Indonesia
Wahyu Nurdiansyah N Study Program of State Development Administration, Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v6i2.2578

Abstract

The management of Regional Property (Barang Milik Daerah, BMD) requires accurate and integrated data to ensure public accountability. The transition from the desktop-based SIMDA-BMD to the web-based Electronic Information System for Regional Property (e-BMD) aims to strengthen digital asset governance. This study analyzes the implementation of e-BMD at the General Bureau of the Regional Secretariat of West Sulawesi Province and its contribution to asset management accountability. Using a qualitative explanatory case study, data were collected through in-depth interviews with nine key informants, direct observation, and documentation, and validated through source and method triangulation. The analysis draws on the DeLone and McLean (2003) Information Systems Success Model, covering system quality, information quality, human resource capacity, and data integration. The findings show that e-BMD is operational for automated bookkeeping and reporting but is not yet optimally institutionalized. The system is technically unreliable during peak hours and carries concentration risk, as one operator manages 8,560 asset objects. A migration discrepancy of 777 units (9.08%) and 281 recorded units of unknown physical whereabouts were also found. e-BMD has strengthened administrative accountability but has not achieved substantive accountability. Aligning human resource capacity, assigning supporting operators, and reconciling asset data periodically are therefore essential.

References

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (16th ed.). Pearson.

Budiarti, L., Iswari, M. N., & Mustari, M. (2026). Strategi pemanfaatan e-BMD dalam mewujudkan administrasi yang akuntabel di SMKPP Negeri Mataram [Strategy for utilizing e-BMD to realize accountable administration at SMKPP Negeri Mataram]. Jurnal Praktisi Administrasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpap.v10i2.1655

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Haryanto, H., Sumaryadi, I., & Kusworo, K. (2020). Implementasi kebijakan SIMDA-BMD dalam pengelolaan aset daerah [Implementation of the SIMDA-BMD policy in regional asset management]. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 115–128.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 47 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pembukuan, Inventarisasi, dan Pelaporan Barang Milik Daerah [Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 47 of 2021 concerning the procedures for bookkeeping, inventory, and reporting of regional property]. Jakarta: Kemendagri.

Laksono, H. (2017). Evaluasi kesuksesan SIMDA-BMD pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Grobogan menggunakan model kombinasi DeLone McLean dan Technology Acceptance Model [Evaluation of the success of SIMDA-BMD in Grobogan Regency using a combined DeLone–McLean and Technology Acceptance Model]. Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 3(2), 151–167.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2012). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (12th ed.). Pearson.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi sektor publik [Public sector accounting]. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muchadi, J., Gamaliel, H., & Afandi, D. (2025). Evaluasi penatausahaan barang milik daerah berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 47 Tahun 2021 pada Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Bitung [Evaluation of regional property administration under Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 47 of 2021 at the Regional Revenue Agency of Bitung City]. Indonesian Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting, 2(10), 2823–2834.

O'Brien, J. A., & Marakas, G. M. (2010). Management information systems (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. (2025). Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Barat Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah [West Sulawesi Provincial Regulation Number 2 of 2025 concerning the management of regional property]. Mamuju: Sekretariat Daerah.

Siregar, D. (2018). Manajemen aset: Strategi penataan hak atas tanah, inventarisasi, penilaian, dan optimalisasi [Asset management: Strategies for land rights arrangement, inventory, valuation, and optimization]. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistyanti. (2025). Evaluasi usability SIPD e-BMD menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS) [Usability evaluation of SIPD e-BMD using the System Usability Scale (SUS)]. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 14(1), 45–56.

Supriyanto. (2015). Implementasi SIMDA-BMD dalam pengelolaan aset daerah [Implementation of SIMDA-BMD in regional asset management]. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 12(3), 320–335.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.