Domestic Product Label Validity as the Primary Constraint on P3DN Implementation through E-Purchasing

Fakhrullah Pawakkari; Muttaqin Muttaqin; Deasy Mauliana

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v6i2.2581

Authors

Fakhrullah Pawakkari Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar
Muttaqin Muttaqin Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar
Deasy Mauliana Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v6i2.2581

Keywords:

Policy Implementation, P3DN, E-Purchasing, Theory of Constraints, Domestic Products

Abstract

The Acceleration of Increased Use of Domestic Products (P3DN) policy turns government procurement into a lever for national industry, yet spending units often fail to translate plans into purchases. At Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar, planned domestic-product spending exceeded 98% annually in 2023–2025, while realization through e-purchasing reached only 23.36%, 51.42%, and 76.47%, respectively. This study identifies the principal constraint on implementing P3DN through e-purchasing and examines the organization's response. Using a qualitative single-case design that integrates Open Systems Theory with the Theory of Constraints, the study gathered data through interviews with twelve informants, non-participant observation, and document analysis, which were analyzed with the interactive model and validated through triangulation. Compliance with P3DN proved conditional. The binding constraint lies outside the organization: domestic product labels in the national e-Catalogue are self-declared by suppliers without verification, shifting the burden of proof to procurement officials, who need an average of 19 minutes to confirm a single product. All 71 packages planned for 2026 were recorded as domestic without verification. Existing practices have merely contained the constraint, and inter-unit synchronization has not reached the planning stage. The effectiveness of label-based policies hinges on the reliability of information in digital procurement infrastructure.

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Aldiansyah, I. H. (2025). Strategi peningkatan produk dalam negeri pada pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah di Kabupaten Bogor [Strategies for increasing domestic products in government procurement of goods/services in Bogor Regency] [Master's thesis]. Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta.

Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462

Dranove, D., & Jin, G. Z. (2010). Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4), 935–963. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.4.935

Faisal, H. A., Perdana, S., & Koto, I. (2025). Analisis efisiensi proses pengadaan barang/jasa di lingkungan pemerintah daerah (Studi di Bagian Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Aceh Singkil) [Analysis of the efficiency of the procurement process for goods/services in regional government: A study at the Procurement Section of the Regional Secretariat of Aceh Singkil Regency]. ALWAQFU: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf, 2(2).

Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461

Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (1984). The goal: A process of ongoing improvement. North River Press.

Grandia, J., & Meehan, J. (2017). Public procurement as a policy tool: Using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2017-0066

Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2016). ‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715598828

Hutasuhut, S. A., Revida, E., & Nasution, M. A. (2025). Efektivitas e-purchasing terhadap pembelian produk dalam negeri di Biro Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Provinsi Sumatera Utara [The effectiveness of e-purchasing on domestic product purchases at the Goods and Services Procurement Bureau of North Sumatra Province]. MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, 9(2), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v9i2.11663

Ikeziri, L. M., Souza, F. B. de, Gupta, M. C., & Fiorini, P. de C. (2019). Theory of constraints: Review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 5068–5102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1518602

Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2010). Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: An option for developing countries? Journal of Public Procurement, 10(3), 368–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-10-03-2010-B003

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.

Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. (2021). Peraturan Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 tentang Toko Daring dan Katalog Elektronik dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [National Public Procurement Agency Regulation Number 9 of 2021 concerning online shops and electronic catalogues in government procurement of goods/services]. Jakarta: LKPP.

Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can electronic procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence from public works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258

Mabin, V. J., & Balderstone, S. J. (2003). The performance of the theory of constraints methodology: Analysis and discussion of successful TOC applications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(6), 568–595. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310476636

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mukhlis, M., & Pranoto, R. (2020). Implikasi pengadaan barang dan jasa secara elektronik bagi efisiensi keuangan dan optimalisasi fungsi pemerintahan [Implications of electronic procurement of goods and services for financial efficiency and the optimization of government functions]. ARISTO, 8(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v8i1.2260

Mulyono, M. (2018). Model terintegrasi berbasis teori konstrain: Optimasi meningkatkan kinerja sistem [An integrated model based on the theory of constraints: Optimization for improving system performance]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mwakapemba, M. L., & Andriana, D. (2025). Cross-sector applications of the theory of constraints and their implications for Tanzania. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 17(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v17i1.98032

Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198–220.

Patunru, A. A. (2018). Rising economic nationalism in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(3), 335–354.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning government procurement of goods/services].

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning the amendment to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 on government procurement of goods/services].

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2022). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Percepatan Peningkatan Penggunaan Produk Dalam Negeri dan Produk Usaha Mikro, Usaha Kecil, dan Koperasi dalam rangka Menyukseskan Gerakan Nasional Bangga Buatan Indonesia pada Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [Presidential Instruction Number 2 of 2022 concerning the acceleration of increased use of domestic products and products of micro enterprises, small enterprises, and cooperatives to support the Proud of Indonesian Products National Movement in government procurement of goods/services].

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025 concerning the second amendment to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 on government procurement of goods/services].

Saragi, J. E. M. (2023). Strategi peningkatan penggunaan produk dalam negeri pada pengadaan barang/jasa pada Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [Strategies for increasing the use of domestic products in the procurement of goods/services at the National Public Procurement Agency] [Master's thesis]. Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta.

Siregar, I. S., Nurhafni, N., & Muhtarom, M. (2024). Effectiveness of the electronic procurement service system in procurement of goods and services in Gayo Lues District in 2021. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 7(1), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i1.37077

Supratman, J., Sjarifudin, D., & Prasmoro, A. V. (2026). Optimalisasi P3DN dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah daerah: Pendampingan dan sosialisasi kebijakan P3DN di lingkungan Pemerintah Kota Bekasi [Optimizing P3DN in regional government procurement: Assistance and dissemination of P3DN policy in the Bekasi City Government]. Jurnal Sains Teknologi dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 7(1), 91–96.

Suryani, E., Nugroho, K. S., & Cadith, J. (2025). E-purchasing: Langkah nyata pemerintah dalam mendukung program peningkatan penggunaan produk dalam negeri (P3DN) [E-purchasing: The government's concrete step in supporting the program to increase the use of domestic products (P3DN)]. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v11i1.4499

Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978