Institutional Homogenization through McDonaldization in the Digital-Based Minimum Service Standards Reporting System (e-monev SPM)

Dio Anggara; Adelheid Pasau Tandipayuk

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.530

Authors

Dio Anggara Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Indonesia
Adelheid Pasau Tandipayuk Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.530

Keywords:

Governance, reporting system, SPM, McDonaldization, digital, e-monev, institutional homogenization

Abstract

Digital-based governance transformation is needed to respond to dynamic global challenges. This article aims to analyze institutional isomorphism through Mcdonaldization in a digital-based minimum service standard reporting system (e-monev SPM). Various studies show that governance needs to be dynamic, collaborative and innovative to achieve an efficient system by utilizing technological developments. In contrast to previous studies, this article argues that the transformation of governance in the reporting system for the implementation of digital-based Minimum Service Standards (e-monev SPM) indicates the occurrence of McDonaldization which is characterized by changes in rationality as a feature of modern society by utilizing technological developments that lead to the occurrence of institutional homogenization. This article uses a qualitative approach with multiple methods. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews, literature studies, secondary data, official documents and digital data. The findings of the data show the occurrence of McDonaldization in 4 (four) dimensions, namely Efficiency seen from changes in reporting mechanisms and speed, Calculability seen from the ability to be used periodically for interested parties, Predictability seen from content standardization and reporting time, and Control seen from e -monev as a digital-based tool to ensure regional compliance in reporting. The institutional homogenization efforts are indicated by the occurrence of Coercive Isomorphism related to the implementation of mandates regarding changes in the reporting system, Mimetic Isomorphism which is shown through the adoption of technology in the reporting system, and Normative Isomorphism which can be seen from organizational professionalization efforts related to increasing human resource capacity, facilities and infrastructure, cooperation, and budget. However, there is also an irrational dimension of McDonaldization rationality, which is related to the readiness of infrastructure and human resources. This article contributes to efforts to improve the quality of governance by utilizing technological developments through a digital-based reporting system .

References

System (SAMSAT) of Banten Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.485-500

Aristovnik, A., Murko, E., & Ravšelj, D. (2022). From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010026

Bacq, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12746

Buhalis, D., O’Connor, P., & Leung, R. (2023). Smart hospitality: from smart cities and smart tourism towards agile business ecosystems in networked destinations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0497

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches 2nd.ed (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc .

Curtis, S. (2019). Digital transformation—the silver bullet to public service improvement? Public Money & Management, 39(5), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611233

Dale, R. (2004). Evaluating Development Programmes and Project Second Edition. Sage Publication.

Pewell, W.W., & DiMaggio P.J. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorfisme in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review. 48 (2), 147-160.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101

Dunleavy, P. , M. H. , B. S. , & T. J. (2006). Public Management Research Association New Public Management Is Dead: Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 48(2).

Fitriyani, E. , & D. R. S. (2021). Collaborative Governance Dalam Layanan Bus Rapid Transit Di Kota Surakarta Tahun 2010-2019: Studi Tentang Kegagalan Kolaborasi. Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) , 3(1).

Goertz, G. (2016). Multimethod Research. Security Studies, 25(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2016.1134016

Hammerschmid, G. S. V. de W. R. A. and A. M. S. M. (2020). New Public Management Reforms In Europe And Their Effects: Findings From A 20-Country Top Executive Survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 85, 399–418.

Henman, P. (2020). Improving public services using artificial intelligence: possibilities, pitfalls, governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188

Huda, M., & Yunas, N. (2016). The Development of e-Government System in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 08(01), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.97-108

Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2022, October 29). Kemendagri: Dorong Pelayanan Publik melalui Penerapan Inovasi Daerah. Https://Bpsdm.Kemendagri.Go.Id/Berita/Page/623.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2022). Laporan Akhir: Koordinasi Strategis Perencanaan dan Penguatan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Minimal di Daerah tahun 2022.

Kementrian PAN-RB. (2020a, November 18). Reformasi Birokrasi Akselerasi Pemerintahan Dinamis di Era VUCA. . Diakses Melalui Https://Menpan.Go.Id/Site/Berita-Terkini/Reformasi-Birokrasi-Akselerasi-Pemerintahan-Dinamis-Di-Era-Vuca .

Kementrian PAN-RB. (2020b, November 18). Strategi Sistem Pelayanan Publik Hadapi Era VUCA. Https://Www.Menpan.Go.Id/Site/Berita-Terkini/Strategi-Sistem-Pelayanan-Publik-Hadapi-Era-Vuca.

MacCharty, John. , & N. A. M. (2022). Exploring The Best Corporate Governance Practices In The Public Sector Organizations In Ghana: The Challenges, Issues, And Prospects. Corporate Governance: An Interdisciplinary Outlook, 100–107.

Martoyo, M., & Sihaloho, N. T. P. (2021). Elemen Sukses Penerapan Dynamic Governance di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Public Policy, 7(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v7i1.3142

Maulina, P. (2018). Mcdonaldisasi Bentuk Pelayanan Publik Pada Sistem E-Filing Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (DJP) Online. Jurnal Public Policy, 4(1), 1–12.

Mislawaty, S. E., Harahap, R., & Anisyah, S. (2022). Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.399-411

Muhammaditya, N., Hardjosoekarto, S., Herwantoko, O., Fany, Y. G., & Subangun, M. I. (2022). Institutional Divergence of Digital Item Bank Management in Bureaucratic Hybridization: An Application of SSM Based Multi-Method. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(4), 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09579-4

Neo, B. S. , & C. G. (2007). Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. . World Scientific Publishing.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 5th.ed. Allyn and Bacon.

Nguyen, N. T. H., Nguyen, D., Vo, N., & Tuan, L. T. (2023). Fostering Public Sector Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Roles of Servant Leadership, Public Service Motivation, and Learning Goal Orientation. Administration & Society, 55(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221100623

Ombudsman RI. (2022a). Ringkasan Eksekutif: Penilaian Kepatuhan Standar Pelayanan Publik Tahun 2021. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.

Ombudsman RI. (2022b, December 30). Rapor Kepatuhan Pelayanan Publik 2021. Https://Www.Ombudsman.Go.Id/Perwakilan/News/r/Pwkinternal--Rapor-Kepatuhan-Pelayanan-Publik-2021.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri RI Nomor 59 tahun 2021 tentang Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Minimal (SPM).

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri RI Nomor 100 tahun 2018 tentang Penerapan SPM.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 tentang Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Minimal (SPM).

Pieterse, J. N. (2009). Globalization and Culture: Global Melange. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of Society Eighth Edition.

Ritzer, G. (2013). The McDonaldization of Society: 20th Anniversary Edition. Sage.

Rivera, J. D., & Knox, C. C. (2023). Bureaucratic discretion, social equity, and the administrative legitimacy dilemma: Complications of New Public Service. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13550

Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service: Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.

Rupita, R., Yulianti, Y., Gaffar, Z. H., Rahmaniah, S. E., & Herlan, H. (2021). COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE DALAM PELAKSANAAN KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI WILAYAH PERBATASAN KALIMANTAN BARAT. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 1(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v1i3.8

Sorensen, E. , & J. T. (n.d.). Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance? Administrative Sciences (127th ed., Vol. 11).

Undang-undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah

Wang, X., Cheng, C., Li, J., Zhang, J., Ma, G., & Jin, J. (2023). Automated monitoring and evaluation of highway subgrade compaction quality using artificial neural networks. Automation in Construction, 145, 104663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104663

Wasistiono, S. , & A. W. (2019). Three Paradigms in Government (Good Governance, Dynamic Governance, and Agile Governance). . International Journal of Kibernology, 4(2), 79–91.