Problem of Authority For Executing Task (PLT) In The Transitional Period of Regional Government Before and After The Simultaneous Elections Based On Law  Number 23 Of 2014 Concerning Local Government

Rona Indara

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v2i3.653

Authors

Rona Indara Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i3.653

Keywords:

Task Executor, Authority, Regional Government

Abstract

The task executor (PLT) in state administration is an official who occupies a temporary position because the official who occupied that position was previously unable to or was subject to legal regulations so that he did not occupy that position. The purpose of this research is to describe the appointment of the PLT if there is a vacancy in the regional head position during the transition period, analyze, qualifications, limits of the PLT authority and strategic policies during the transition period, but are still held by the PLT and know and analyze the sanctions given to the PLT who does something outside authority. The method used in this scientific work is a normative and qualitative juridical research method that is studied holistically, contextually, progressively, it is known that a. The appointment of Acting Governors is appointed by the President through a proposal from the Minister of Home Affairs, while the appointment of Regents/Mayors is appointed by the Minister of Home Affairs through a proposal by the Governor. b. The qualifications of the PLT who were appointed based on Law Number 8 of 2015 article 201 paragraph (8) to fill the vacancy for the position of Governor are from middle high leadership positions. b. If during the change period a strategic policy is needed that must be taken by the acting head, then it is regulated by Article 132 A paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 49 of 2008 concerning the Third Amendment to Government Regulation Number 6 of 2005 concerning Election, Ratification of Appointment and Dismissal of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Head, which must be approved by the Minister of Home Affairs. c. In fact, there are no clear provisions for the Plt who abuses his authority, as the type of authority given to the PLT is unclear.

References

Atmojo, M. E., & Fridayani, H. D. (2019). Analysis of the open selection process for structural officials (echelon ii) in sleman regency. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 6(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v6i2.6451

Fikri, S., & Wibisono, R. B. (2023). Principle of Original Authority in Territorial Decentralization. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 2(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i1.387

Herold, K. (2020). Insolvency frameworks for state and local governments. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 20(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336

Inshakova, A. O., Goncharov, A. I., & Salikov, D. A. (2020). Electronic-Digital Smart Contracts: Modernization of Legal Tools for Foreign Economic Activity. In The 21st Century from the Positions of Modern Science: Intellectual, Digital and Innovative Aspects (pp. 3–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32015-7_1

Ishak, N. (2019). Implementation and Supervision of Official Discretion in Local Government of Republic of Indonesia. Jurnal Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 8(2).

Kokhanovskaya, I. I., Fatykhova, A. L., Suleimanova, F. M., & Golovneva, E. V. (2019). Use of information technologies of management in public authorities activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1333(7), 72010. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/0.1088/1742-6596/1333/7/072010

Kostrubiec, J. (2018). Status of a Voivodship Governor as an Authority Responsible for the Matters of Security and Public Order. Barometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy, 16(5), 35–42.

Lisjak, J., Rončević, A., & Markovinović, D. (2021). Key Tasks and Competences of Spatial Data Manager in Local Self-Government. Tehnički Glasnik, 15(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20201117134708

Melikuziyevich, K. P., & Abdurashidovich, T. M. (2021). State and community management-as a priority task in the appeal. International Journal of Discourse on Innovation, Integration and Education, 2(2), 133–136.

Msinga, S. M. S., Ndinya, A., Ogada, M., & Omido, K. (2018). Differentiation strategies and performance of insurance companies in nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 7(11), 15–29.

Muhammad, F., Umiyati, S., & Rianto, B. (2023). Policy Implementation of Military Operations Tasks Other Than War Units Squadron-13/Serbu Puspenerbad in Acceleration of Handling of Covid-19 in Berau, East Kalimantan. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 6(01).

Munawwaroh, S., Larasati, E., Suwitri, S., & Warsono, H. (2019). Policy implementation of working culture development in ministry of religious affairs. Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 4(4(10)), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2019-4/10-04

Nugroho, R. M., & Asmorojati, A. W. (2019). Simultaneous Local Election in Indonesia: Is It Really More Effective and Efficient? Jurnal Media Hukum, 26(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20190135

Partovi, T., & Razavi, M. R. (2019). The effect of game-based learning on academic achievement motivation of elementary school students. Learning and Motivation, 68, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101592

Permatasari, Y., Jinaratana, A., Hadiwinata, C., Yapputro, P. A., & Syahrin Najmi, M. (2023). Regional Autonomy in the Context of Regional Regulations. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 1(09), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i09.37

Pinto, D., Aveiro, D., Pacheco, D., Gouveia, B., & Gouveia, D. (2021). Validation of DEMO’s Conciseness Quality and Proposal of Improvements to the Process Model. In Enterprise Engineering Working Conference (pp. 133–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74196-9_8

Rahayu, R., & Atmojo, M. E. (2019). Human resources planning of government apparatus in Special Region of Yogyakarta in 2017. Journal of Local Government Issues, 2(1), 75–90.

Rullo, L. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic crisis and the personalization of the government in Italy. International Journal of Public Leadership, 17(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-08-2020-0083

Sadiq, A., Javed, M. U., Khalid, R., Almogren, A., Shafiq, M., & Javaid, N. (2021). Blockchain Based Data and Energy Trading in Internet of Electric Vehicles. IEEE Access, 9, 7000–7020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048169

Saputra, G. R. (2022). Influence of Human Resource Competence, Internal Control System, Participation in Budget Preparation, and Accounting Control on Performance Accountability of Local Government Agencies. International Conference on Sustainable Innovation Track Accounting and Management Sciences (ICOSIAMS 2021), 197–203. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211225.028

Saraswati, R., Ristyawati, A., & Basworo, R. S. (2020). Recent developments and changes in the governance of regional legal products in Indonesia: Supervision, evaluation and clarification mechanisms. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(7), 1–9.

Sarnawa, B. (2018). Legal Friction of State Civil Apparatus Neutrality in Indonesia. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 1(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.1105

Seebauer, S., & Babcicky, P. (2018). Trust and the communication of flood risks: comparing the roles of local governments, volunteers in emergency services, and neighbours. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12313

Supriyanto, D., Faturohman, D., Unsong, O. L., Wahyudianty, M. U., & Sampe, F. (2022). Analysis of the implementation of certain functional position equalization policies at the regional personnel, education, and training agency of mataram city, west nusa tenggara province. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(2), 687–696. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v30i2.2349

Tangi, L., Benedetti, M., Gastaldi, L., Noci, G., & Russo, C. (2021). Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy: Evidence from Italian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101543

Veeck, G., Veeck, A., & Yu, H. (2020). Challenges of agriculture and food systems issues in China and the United States. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.002

Wahyuni, I. I., & Huda, M. K. (2021). Legal Norms and Principles of Decentralization of Authorities in Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic. Lex Publica, 8(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.8.1.2021.31-50

Wayenberg, E., Resodihardjo, S. L., Voets, J., Van Genugten, M., Van Haelter, B., & Torfs, I. (2022). The Belgian and Dutch response to COVID-19: change and stability in the mayors’ position. Local Government Studies, 48(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1958787

Wei, Y., Guo, Y., & Su, J. (2021). Dancing on a tightrope: The reputation management of local governments in response to public protests in China. Public Administration, 99(3), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12699

Yang, X., Yan, J., Tian, K., Yu, Z., Yu Li, R., & Xia, S. (2021). Centralization or decentralization? the impact of different distributions of authority on China’s environmental regulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121172