Legal Clarification On The Use Of Basements In The Context Of Public Land Acquisition In Indonesia

Diyan Isnaeni

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.729

Authors

Diyan Isnaeni University of Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.729

Keywords:

Basement Use, Land Acquisition, Indonesian Agrarian Law Introduction

Abstract

Rapid urban growth and increasing infrastructure needs in Indonesia are driving an increasing need for basement use. Even so, significant legal challenges arise, especially with regard to rights to the crypt and conflict resolution mechanisms. The lack of clarity in the basic agrarian law and the law on Land Acquisition for the public interest creates the potential for conflict and social injustice in the procurement and use of basements. This study conducted a normative legal analysis of the agrarian Basic Law and the land acquisition law for the public interest, and evaluated how these laws operate in practice. Through a philosophical and analytical approach, the study considers the underlying legal principles and evaluates the effectiveness of existing regulation and enforcement. In seeking a solution to this challenge, the study considers a range of measures, including legal reform to provide further clarification on the right to a basement; development of effective and fair conflict resolution mechanisms; and increased protection of the rights and interests of landowners in the process of land acquisition. These solutions will be tailored to the local context and needs and involve the participation of all interested parties. This research seeks a deeper understanding of how laws operate in this context and evaluates whether existing laws are sufficient and effective in regulating these issues. The results of this study are expected to make an important contribution in formulating and updating legal regulations on the use of basements in the context of land acquisition for public use in Indonesia.

References

Abqa, M. A. R., Junaidi, Hutabarat, S. A., Suhariyanto, D., Fauziah, N. M., Khilmi, E. F., Meliana, Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). HUKUM TATA NEGARA: Sebuah Konsep Dasar dalam Menata Bangsa. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Afifah, S. S., Kurniati, N., & Zamil, Y. S. (2018). Penggunaan Ruang Bawah Tanah untuk Bangunan Gedung ditinjau dari Peraturan Perundang-Undangan terkait yang berlaku. Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 3(1).

Apripari, A., Swarianata, V., Puluhulawa, J., Puluhulawa, I., & Matte, D. N. (2023). Investigating the Existence of Gorontalo Customary Law in the National Criminal Code. Dialogia Iuridica, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v14i2.6250

Bates, D. (2006). Political theology and the nazi state: Carl schmitt’s concept of the institution. Modern Intellectual History, 3(3), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244306000862

Bradbrook, A. J. (1987). Relevance of the cujus est solum doctrine to the surface landowner’s claims to natural resources located above and beneath the land. Adel. L. Rev., 11, 462.

Gobel, R. T. S., Muhtar, M. H., & Putri, V. S. (2023). Regulation And Institutional Arrangement Of Village-Owned Enterprises After The Work Creation Era Applied. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 16(1), 15–33.

Harahap, T. K., Prayuti, Y., Latianingsih, N., Damanik, A., Maheni, T., Farida, I., Muhtar, M. H., & Mustaqim. (2023). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. Penerbit Tahta Media. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/255

Haryati, S. H. (2016). Demokrasi, Negara Indonesia. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT, 5(1).

Hermawan, S., & Hananto, S. A. (2021). Pengaturan Ruang Bawah Tanah berdasarkan Prinsip Agraria Nasional. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 27–44.

Indra, M., Saragih, G. M., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia: Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 279–299.

Ishaq, I. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi. Alfabeta.

Mahmud, M. P. (2017). Penelitian Hukum edisi revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Putri, V. S., Muhtar, M. H., Winarsasi, P. A., & Manullang, S. O. (2023). Kewenangan Izin Pemanfaatan Ruang Pasca Undang-undang Cipta Kerja. Eureka Media Aksara. https://repository.penerbiteureka.com/publications/563020/

Robbina, A., Sari, A. F., Zahra, A. A., Aji, D., & Fitria Nur Lita, L. (2023). ANALISIS PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR NASIONAL (KERETA CEPAT JAKARTA-BANDUNG).

Said, S. N. F., & Irwansyah, I. (2019). Land Acquisition by the Government and the Impact for the Community. Papua Law Journal, 3(2), 117–133.

Sibuea, H. Y. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Pemanfaatan Ruang Di Bawah Tanah. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 4(1), 17–34.

Surono, A., Sisingamangaraja, J., & Baru, K. (2017). Perlindungan hak korban pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan jalan tol di Kabupaten Kendal. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum P-Issn, 1410, 5632.

UISSO, A., Sevgen, S. C., & TANRIVERMİŞ, H. (t.t.). The plight of urban settlements based on the proliferation of dichotomy in Tanzania. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(3), 262–276.