Analysis of Armed Separatist Movement Conflict in Casamance, Senegal & Lessons Learned for the Indonesian Government in Addressing Similar Conflicts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.788Keywords:
Armed Separatist Movement; Casamance; Conflict Resolution Strategies; Lessons LearnedAbstract
This in-depth article explores the complex factors that have contributed to the long-standing armed separatist conflict in Casamance, Senegal. It offers an analysis of the most effective approaches to resolving the conflict, drawing valuable lessons that can be applied to other nations grappling with similar challenges. Historical, socio-economic, political, and cultural factors all play a role in the conflict, which has endured for decades. There are additional issues to navigate, including military fragmentation, political leadership voids, economic and cultural decline, failed ceasefires, and neighboring state behavior. By examining these causes and lessons learned, this article provides valuable insights for Indonesia and other nations facing separatist movements. Despite the daunting nature of the conflict, there are several potential solutions that can be employed to facilitate successful negotiations in the future, including trust-building, official and unofficial mediation, the establishment of a State Peace Secretariat in Casamance, and a comprehensive, inclusive settlement negotiation.
References
Fall, A. (2010). Understanding The Casamance Conflict: A Background.
Jeng, A. (2017). How and Why Did the MFDC Lose the Battle for Independence? The Casamance Conflict.
Kohnert, D. (2010). Governance and Socio-Economic Development in Casamance/Senegal: A Challenge for ECOWAS. Africa Spectrum, 45(2), 47-68.
M. Abdallah, L. A. (2014). Mediating conflict in West Africa: An overview of regional experiences.
Rizaldi, S. A. (2021). Separatisme Papua dan Ancaman Terhadap Kedaulatan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 10(1), 13-24.
Otto, C. and J. Otto. 2005. “Building for Peace and Prosperity in the Casamance Region of Senegal: A Case Study.” World Education Report. World Education and United States Agency for International Development (USAID). http://www.worlded.org/WEIInternet/inc/common/_download_pub.cfm?id=4392 &lid=3
Senghor, M. A. (2014). Separatist Conflict in Casamance: Examining Causes and Consequences. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14(2), 49-70.
Sidibé, D. (2022). Negotiating Seemingly Intractable Conflict : The Case of Casamance Conflict. Journal Of Arbitration and Mediation, 130.
UCDP. (2021). Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP). Retrieved from Peace Research Institute: http://www.pcr.uu.se/
United States Department of State. 8 April 2011. “2010 Human Rights Report: Senegal.” Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Accessed 12 February 2016. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/160141.pdf.
Woocher, L. S. 2000. “The ‘Casamance Question’: An Examination of the Legitimacy of Self-Determination in Southern Senegal.” International Journal on Minority & Group Rights. Vol. 7(4), 341.1.
World Bank. 2016. “Doing Business 2016: Senegal.” http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/senegal.
Zahedi, K. (2016). The Challenge: Trust and Reconciliation, Casamance: Understanding Conflict. John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, 21-31
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sakinatunnafsih Anna, Anang Puji Utama , Bayu Setiawan , Pujo Widodo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








































