Legal Analysis Of Judges' Decisions On The Imposing Of Sanctions For Perpetrators Of The Criminal Act Of Murder Study Of Decision NO. 264/PID.B/2024/PN RHL

Febri Kurniawan; Risdalina Risdalina; Indra Kumalasari M

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1668

Authors

Febri Kurniawan Labuhan Batu University Faculty of Law
Risdalina Risdalina Labuhan Batu University Faculty of Law
Indra Kumalasari M Labuhan Batu University Faculty of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1668

Keywords:

Legal Analysis, Judge's Decision, Imposition Of Sanctions.

Abstract

The method used in this research is normative legal research, namely research into problems by looking at the sources of applicable regulations relating to the title.Legal Analysis of Judge's Decision on the Imposition of Sanctions on Murder Perpetrators Study of Decision No. 264/PID.B/2024/PN RHL. InThe decision of the Rokan Hilir District Court No. 264/Pid.B/2024/PN Rhl has declared the Defendant Hari Kurniawan alias Ari bin Sugianto and has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of premeditated murder, as in the indictment of the Public Prosecutor by sentencing the Defendant to a prison sentence of 19 (nineteen) years.is very much in accordance with the concept of justice mentioned by John Rawls that the justice enforcement program with a people's dimension must pay attention to two principles of justice, namely: Providing equal rights and opportunities for the broadest basic freedoms as broad as the same freedom for everyone. The results of the study show that the judge in this decision based his considerations on Article 338 of the Criminal Code concerning ordinary murder, by adjusting the trial facts to the elements of the article. The judge's considerations involved subjective aspects, such as the defendant's psychological condition, and objective aspects, such as evidence and witness statements. Although the decision reflects elements of justice, several aspects, such as the application of maximum sanctions and efforts to prevent similar crimes, still require further evaluation. This study concludes that law enforcement in this case reflects the application of the principle of legality, but there is room for increased effectiveness through regulatory reform and more progressive implementation of criminal law.

References

Berencana, P. (2021). 1361-3837-1-Sm. 15(3), 397–404.

C.D.M., I. G. A. D. L., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Program, D. G. S. M. (2020). Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1), 48–58. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/28834

Dedi Romadhan, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2021). Analisis Putusan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Putusan Nomor 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3079.25-30

Duha, A. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/PN Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, 1(2), 124–138.

Giawa, E. E., Prodi, M., Hukum, I., & Pembunuhan, T. P. (2025). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN HUKUMAN KEPADA PELAKU. 4(1), 193–203.

Kewarganegaraan, J., Gurusi, L., Salam, S., Hukum, F., & Buton, U. M. (2023). Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Terhadap Pelaku Penganiayaan yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia. 7(2), 2619–2628.

Ohoiner, M. A., Latupeirissa, J. E., & Ubwarin, E. (2023). Analisa Putusan Hakim Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Pembunuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 15 / Pid . Sus-Anak / 2021 / PN Amb ). 1, 292–297.

Patel. (2019). Novi Yanti, Samingan. 1(1), 9–25.

Pokhrel, S. (2024). No TitleΕΛΕΝΗ. In Αγαη (Vol. 15, Issue 1).

Pratama, A., Nashriana, N., & Novianti, V. (2018). Analisis Putusan Hakim terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 1358 …. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/955/

Putusan, K., Pid, N., & Jkt, B. P. N. (2022). TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA. 2(2), 851–869.

Sanjaya, S., Amalia, R. F., Affreddyan, A., Roby, R., & Butar, D. B. (2022). Analisis Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Prabumulih Nomor: 25/Pid. B/2021/Pn/Pbm). Lexstricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i1.2

Widianto, S. (2016). Analisis Putusan Hakim terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 668/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jkt.Tim dan Putusan Nomor 1001/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Jkt.Tim Soni. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 01(June), 1–23.