Phenomenology: Touching life beyond transactions

Lita Dharmayuni

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.1965

Authors

Lita Dharmayuni Department of Accounting, YAI College of Economics, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.1965

Abstract

This paper briefly reviews what underlies a person's consciousness of doing business and transactions from a phenomenological perspective. With literature study method, this study help us to understand and explain why and how transactions between individuals started and developed into a multi-stakeholder global economy. This research contribute: first, enriching research related to phenomemology and economics. Second, broadens our understanding of the role of each individual in the economy. From this study we know that what drives us to conduct transactions and shape the economy are caused by, how we as humans make decisions; how we interact with each other and how the economy as a whole work.

References

Abdi, F. F., Hafiar, H., & Novianti, E. (2015). Perilaku Komunikasi Etnis TIonghoa Peranakan dalam Bisnis Kelaurga (Studi Fenomenologi mengenai perilaku komunikasi Etnis Tionghoa Peranakan dalam Bisnis Keluarga di Jakarta). Jurnal Komunikasi, IX No 2(2).

Alvarez, W. (2017). Phenomenology of Cultural Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0121

Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational Determinants of Risk Taking Behavior. Psychological Review, 64 No 6, 359.

Becker, G. M., & Mcclintocks, C. G. (1967). Value: Behavioral Decision Theory. Annual Review of Psychological, 18(1), 239–286. www.annualreviews.org

Berger, P. L. (1969). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of A Sociological Theory of Religion. Anchor Books.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality.

Bochenski, I. M. (1965). The Methods of Contemporery Thought. Diterjemahkan dari Die zeitgenössischen Denkmethoden oleh Peter Caws. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.4.381

Craig, edward. (2005). The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.

Dahlan, M. (2010). Pemikiran Fenomenologi Edmund Husserl dan Aplikasinya dalam Dunia Sains dan Studi Agama. Jurnal Salam UMM.

Dahlberg, K. (2006). The Individual in the World-The World in the Individual: Towards a Human Science Phenomenology that Includes the Social World. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 6, 1–9.

Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications, Second edition. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral Decision Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 473–498. www.annualreviews.org

Faÿ, E., & Riot, P. (2007). Phenomenological Approaches to Work, Life and Responsibility. Society and Business Review, 2(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465680710757367

Hasbiansyah, O. (2005). Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar PraktikPenelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi. Mediator, Vol 9 No 1.

Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Diterjemahkan oleh W.R. Boyce Gibson. Collier Books. http://www.iep.utm.edu/husserl/IntersubjectivityInfo:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/#EmpIntLif

Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction To Phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/ The Hague.

Kasali, R. (2008). Metode-metode Riset Kualitatif. Mizan Media Utama.

Kolakowski, L. (2001). Husserl and the Search for Certitude. St. Augustine’s Press.

Kordeš, U. (2009). The Phenomenology of Decision Making Classification. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 7(2), 65–77.

Laily, N. (2013). Praktik Akuntansi pada Bisnis Retail: Sebuah Studi Fenomenologi. Moderenisasi, Volume 9, Nomor 3.

Lubis, A. Y. (2019). Filsafat Ilmu : Klasik hingga kontemporer. Edisi 1. Rajawali Press.

Mankiw, N. G. (2004). Principles of Economics, Third Edition. Harvard University Thomson.

Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of Economics Ninth Edition. Harvard University Cengage.

Morner, M., & von Krogh, G. (2009). A Note on Knowledge Creation in Open-Source Software Projects: What Can We Learn from Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9139-7

O’Connor, D. E., & Faille, C. C. (2000). Basic Economic Principles: A Guide for Student. Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated.

Prajna-Nugroho, I. (2012). “Intensional dan Intersubjektivitas dalam Fenomenologi Husserl” dalam Jurnal Filsafat Driyarkara Tahun XXXIII. Jurnal Filsafat Driyarkara Tahun XXXIII, Jakarta, No.2/2012.

Rutten, M. E. J., Dorée, A. G., & Halman, J. I. M. (2013). Exploring the value of a novel decision-making theory in understanding R&D progress decisions. Management Decision, 51(1), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291382

Slovic, P., Fischhaff, B., Lichtenstein2, S., Collins, N., & Roecker, P. (1977). Behavioral Decision Theory. In Ann. Rev. Psychol (Vol. 28). www.annualreviews.org

Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Martinus Nijhoff / The Hague.

Sudarman. (2014). Fenomenologi Husserl Sebagai Metode Filsafat Eksistensial. Al-AdYaN/Vol.IX, N0.2/Juli-Desember.

Tsoukas, H. (2009). A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435

Warnock, M. (1989). Existentialism (p. 26). Oxford University Press.